Nowadays, more and more people are choosing to socialize online rather than face to face. Is this a positive or negative development?
Benefited from the success of information technology, people seem to prefer using social media to taking in person. This is definitely a positive development as far as I concerned. The reasons are following.
Plenty of time has been saved via convenient internet access to social media. In the old days even before telephone is invented, it took at least days for people to send mails in exchange for information. Today, we are keeping in touch with our friends almost every seconds as long as we have internet access. The time wasted on waiting and arranging a meeting are obsolete and no longer needed. So, how we can refuse the obvious convenience social media offered?
Indirect communication are perfect for people who are introvert or have social anxiety. There are a substantial proportion of us are not the outgoing type of person, which means talking through social media can help some of them. Even for those who have absolutely no problem with socializing, occasions when face to face communicating is awkward still exist. And social media is the exact cue for this. Take for example online dating, which has been extremely popular ever since, helps people to meet people worldwide and makes it not so award compared to real life dating.
Some people may blame the isolation of people in modern society to social media, however, the point is that essentially technology offers us more alternative ways for communication, it is not compulsory. Face to face socializing is still the major means for interaction of people. Therefore, online communication is defiantly a positive development for mankind.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-01-13 | http_essay | 60 | view |
| 2018-09-23 | iambach | 89 | view |
- Some people think that money is one of the most essential factors in promoting happiness Do you think people can be happy without much money What other factors contribute towards happiness 90
- Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership. 50
- Nowadays more and more people are choosing to socialize online rather than face to face Is this a positive or negative development 60
- the first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use.summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make compa 73
- The diagram below shows the stages and equipment used in the cement making process, and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 363, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tly a positive development for mankind.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, second, so, still, therefore, at least, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1358.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12452830189 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81078632378 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615094339623 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6891608083 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.875 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5625 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3125 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238501620613 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0774166264448 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.062914715397 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155704239722 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0860914215163 0.056905535591 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.