The chart below shows the number of Apple iPhones sold between June 2007 and December 2010.
The bar graph depicts the sales of Apple iPhone between June 2007 to December 2010. The striking feature of the chart is accelerating trend exhibited by the sales in this interval.
At a fleeting glance, it is clearly observed that in the second half of 2007, sales burgeoned to 2.3 million then it collapsed to 0.7 million in the second quarter of 2008. However, the trading of iPhones dramatically surged to 6.9 million in September 2008 which was the highest sale till June 2009. Afterward, the vending soared to 7.4 million in September 2009.
It is interesting to note that sales maintained consistency from October 2009 to March 2010. Moving further, after a slight reduction in sales in the second quarter of 2010, the dealing rocketed to a greater extent and reached at 11.8 and 14.1 in the last second and last quarter of 2010.
To sum up, the passion, as well as enthusiasm of individuals, demonstrate a plenty of oscillations towards purchasing of Apple mobile phones but the most significant trend of elevation was shown in 2008
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-01-15 | Stephanie Kaushal | 82 | view |
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of time since digital technology is now replacing their function. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- In the past, sporting champions used to be motivated primarily by the desire to win a match or to break world records. These days they are more likely to be motivated by prize money and the opportunity to be famous.What message does this send to young peo 61
- Families who send their children to private schools should not be required to pay taxes that support the state education system. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 89
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 78
- The graphs show enrolment in different colleges in the Higher Colleges of Technology in 1999. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, so, then, thus, well, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 872.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89887640449 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69095845694 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584269662921 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.580999397 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.625 5.23603664747 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191310365271 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0930987000554 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133444792031 0.0843802449381 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124901645102 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122616254093 0.0819641961636 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.