As water is a valuable resource, governments all over the world should control how much water their citizens use.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
As it is well known that homo sapiens need water to survive. We utilize water in a plenty of our household works which ranges from bathing to washing, drinking to cleaning and so on. However, it is an undeniable fact that numerous regions are facing water undersupply which leads into several troubles. From my notion, the conservation of water should be according to the place where you live.
At the outset of this new millennium, there are a plethora of countries which have enough supply of water to cope up with their day to day needs while some regions have a shortage of water to an extent that they do not even get enough to drink. Broadly speaking, the supply of water is linked to the condition of an environment as well as weather prevailing in that area. For instance, European countries do not worry about water supply because they have enough rainfall.
On the flip side, there are some sectors which experience drought, to exemplify, a few countries of Africa, Asia, Australia and Middle East. There should be certain strict measures of consume water so that wastage can be avoided. Not just this, Government should impose tax on the usage so that people can use it carefully. To epitomize, a recent survey shown that 1900 individuals got challaned for excess use of water. Last but not least, citizens should be encouraged to save water so that they can face the situations like drought.
Mulling over the topic, for me, different countries have different requirements, so, it is unnecessary to impose rules of conservation everywhere. The rules should be according to the needs along with criteria.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-26 | trlnanhh | 87 | view |
| 2018-03-19 | kimloan268 | 74 | view |
- The graph shows the percentage of male and female academic staff members across the faculties of major university in 2012. 93
- The two graphs show the main sources of energy in the USA in the 1980s and the 1990s. 73
- The charts below show the percentage of monthly household income spent on various items by two different groups in one European country. 95
- The graph and pie chart below give information on in-house training courses in a large financial company. 84
- Plan A below shows a health centre in 2005. Plan B shows the same place in the present day. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
As it is well known that homo sapiens need...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, well, while, broadly speaking, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1349.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88768115942 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62395646935 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572463768116 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5696135453 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.3571428571 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7142857143 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235322739212 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0808971748063 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0409081231218 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128867324718 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0416552874596 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.