In this day and age, water is a rare resource and less abundant than it used to be last few decades. Thus, there is an opinion that encourage the state to stay aware of residents' water usage in order to avoid overusing and wasting. As far as I am concerned, I partly agree with this phenomenon and this essay will discuss sides as well as provide my final conclusion.
There are several reasons to expain why government should cate an eye on using water of their citizens. To begin, water is now difficult to find and there is merely lack of water in some destinations, so, people should be controlled in using water for many purpsoses such as cooking or serving personal needs. Next, it is believed that more than 70% of body parts are fulfilled with water, but this local belief is esay to be misunderstood and it correlates to the waste of water which is caused by human. By drinking a large amount of water, both people and resources might be harmed in the near future. In addition, if governments provide a rule for this case, people will reduce the wasted water. Actually, we cannot live without water, so, when it comes to extinction, it means that people is going to be extincted. Thus, if governments provide a rule for this case, people will reduce the wasted water. In addition, people should follow the rules of their governments to protect this significant sources.
However, I would argue that without the leaders, people still have their awareness on water protection. First of all, city-dwellers should educate themselves and their children to minimize the unneccessary water usage.For instance, parents might guide their offsprings to lock the tap of the sink whenever they donnot use or recycle water if that source does not contain any impuritites. Moreover, water protection is not a huge issue to be entirely controlled and monitored by governments. I believe that all levels of people in this modern world are consciously know that water is vital and indispensable. Last but not least, there are plenty of non-profit organisations which are opened to welcome people to save water and other resources of natural energy. Thus, it is adequant to let human save water instead of any reules or laws from higher position.
To conclude, governments controll people is good but having mentioned, it is unecessary to do that. So, my perspective goes with the idea that citizens an stand on their own to save resources so that the state can lead biiger social issues.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 219, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: For
...o minimize the unneccessary water usage.For instance, parents might guide their off...
^^^
Line 5, column 565, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'known'.
Suggestion: known
...le in this modern world are consciously know that water is vital and indispensable. ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 153, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ective goes with the idea that citizens an stand on their own to save resources so...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, however, if, moreover, so, still, thus, well, for instance, in addition, such as, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2063.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 426.0 315.596192385 135% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84272300469 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54310108192 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66799399123 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539906103286 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 657.0 506.74238477 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3661588154 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.578947368 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4210526316 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.73684210526 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.360103493246 0.244688304435 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118835152933 0.084324248473 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0428740719332 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211754863797 0.151304729494 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0552792412682 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.