Some people believe that scientific discoveries have given us a much better understanding of the world around us. Others believe that science has revealed to us that the world is infinitely more complex than we ever realized.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
Science has indeed edified humans. From ancient time when stars where used for exploration on earth to modern times where stars are subject to exploration, science has changed our persception. The given statement presents that there are also those who believe that this elightenment has left us amused over the complexity of world. It is certainly true, that now we are exposed to myriad of unexplainable phemomenons. But, these are mere enigmas waiting to be solved just the way mankind has solved other mysteries. For several reasons one can deduce that scientific discoveries have given us a much better understanding of world around us.
To begin with, during parochial times it was beleived that earth was flat and at the center of universe, while the inception of idea that it is round and not the center of universe attracted a lot of negative critism. The precarious concept daunted parochial views. And people abstained from these complex ideas. Instead of getting accolades Aristotel was sentenced to punishment of highest degree. But nowadays when every single chid realizes that earth is round and it revolves around sun the concept has gone trite. There are no discussions related to this topic and people have profound assismilation of information. This difference in thinking is what is highlited in the given statement. The people who believe that science has made the world complex are those who have peripheral knowledge and are afraid of precarious paths ahead. While the ones who support that our understanding of world is always increasing are the one who have gone used to with the information that science provided.
Aditionally, in field of medical sciences, people once afraid and reticent of their medical problems, now participate in open discussions to get familiar with their condition and pass the information along. They do not dwindel afraid of the complex problems they have.
Conclusively, science has given us more understanding of the world around us and it has given us an eternal torch which will forever guide us. It is merely the dark path after short distance ahead of us which daunts and make us wonder about what lies ahed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-24 | salamikehinde | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-10 | Cursed God | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-08 | roudabehvm16 | 54 | view |
| 2019-11-01 | shahryar2222 | 54 | view |
| 2019-08-23 | gbhardwa | 33 | view |
- Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership. 16
- ARGUMENT:A recent sales study indicates that consumption of seafood dishes in Bay City restaurants has increased by 30 percent during the past five years. Yet there are no currently operating city restaurants whose specialty is seafood. Moreover, the majo 41
- Some people argue that successful leaders in government, industry, or other fields must be highly competitive. Other people claim that in order to be successful, a leader must be willing and able to cooperate with others.Write a response in which you disc 50
- It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are generated and preserved.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developin 50
- TPO-30 - Integrated Writing Task A little over 2,200 years ago, the Roman navy attacked the Greek port city of Syracuse. According to some ancient historians, the Greeks defended themselves with an ingenious weapon called a "burning mirror": a polished co 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 380, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the highest'.
Suggestion: of the highest
...s Aristotel was sentenced to punishment of highest degree. But nowadays when every single ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 12.4196629213 16% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.3162921348 186% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1815.0 2235.4752809 81% => OK
No of words: 357.0 442.535393258 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08403361345 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71247985068 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 215.323595506 91% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549019607843 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 570.6 704.065955056 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.9261504486 60.3974514979 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.5263157895 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7894736842 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.05263157895 5.21951772744 39% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.377863436649 0.243740707755 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0963634517115 0.0831039109588 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125652830914 0.0758088955206 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214840505928 0.150359130593 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.13342660164 0.0667264976115 200% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 14.1392134831 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.