The lecture argues that no memoir is correct in every detail; however, Chevalier’s memoir is pretty accurate and reliable. This doesn’t agree with the passage claiming that the Chevalier distorted or invented many events in the memoir to make his life seem more exciting and glamorous than it really was.
To begin with, the passage doubts the accuracy that he was wealthy because he borrowed a lot of money from Swizz merchant. The lecture argues that borrowing money from merchant doesn’t mean Chevalier was poor because he possessed the property which had to be sold first to pay for the parties and gambling. It took time for the bank to process; thus, he had to borrow money when he waited for the money.
Moreover, the second difference between the passage and lecture is about the accuracy of the conversation between he and Voltaire. The passage states that the memoir was written many years after the conversation; therefore, exact details would be skeptical. The lecture suggests that Chevalier states his memoir every night. Even his server confirmed that he noted his memoir and journals regularly.
Last, the passage shows that Chevalier’s escape from a Venice prison is also questioned. Chevalier had many politically influential friends who can offer him a bribe. The lecture contends that other prisoners had even more powerful friends, yet no one got out of the prions through bribery. What’s more, the record indicates that the ceiling of the prison had been repaired soon after his breaking out.
- TPO-15 - Integrated Writing Task The cane toad is a large (1.8 kg) amphibian species native to Central and South America. It was deliberately introduced to Australia in 1935 with the expectation that it would protect farmers' crops by eating harmful insec 79
- TPO-09 - Integrated Writing Task Car manufacturers and governments have been eagerly seeking a replacement for the automobile's main source of power, the internal-combustion engine. By far the most promising alternative source of energy for cars is the hy 72
- TOEFL T P O 12 Integrated Writing Task 66
- TPO-25 - Integrated Writing Task In 1938 an archaeologist in Iraq acquired a set of clay jars that had been excavated two years earlier by villagers constructing a railroad line. The vessel was about 2,200 years old. Each clay jay contained a copper cylin 69
- TPO-08 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television advertising directed towards young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Essay evaluation report
between he and Voltaire
between him and Voltaire
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 25 in 30
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 13 12
No. of Words: 252 250
No. of Characters: 1236 1200
No. of Different Words: 140 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.984 4.2
Average Word Length: 4.905 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.395 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 94 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 68 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 42 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 22 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.385 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.534 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.615 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.381 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.612 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.227 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 107, Rule ID: BETWEEN_PRP[1]
Message: Incorrect form of the pronoun 'he'. Use: 'between him'.
Suggestion: between him
... about the accuracy of the conversation between he and Voltaire. The passage states that t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, moreover, really, second, so, therefore, thus, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1301.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 250.0 270.72406181 92% => OK
Chars per words: 5.204 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6963115547 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 396.0 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4589418095 49.2860985944 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.076923077 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2307692308 21.698381199 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61538461538 7.06452816374 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.467570454286 0.272083759551 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.167931196709 0.0996497079465 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.060245010112 0.0662205650399 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.278489320345 0.162205337803 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0463917008974 0.0443174109184 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.3589403974 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.