Teachers, like every human being, have the right to have their own political and social inclinations. I agree with the statement that teachers should not make their social or political views known to their students in the classroom. I will explain the reasons for my stance in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, someone once said " Do not give me a fish, but teach me how to fish". In the contemporary world, the role of the teachers should be providing the learners with the necessary skills and techniques of critical thinking. The pupils must learn how to investigate and examine every new aspect in life, they have to establish their own judgement. Having said that, the educators should not influence their students with their personal social or political opinions. If the teacher revealed their own stance about the debatable issues, their views would cloud the judgement of their students about the same topics. Hence, I envision that the teacher must keep their perspective in a grey area as much as possible. That is due to the fact that any learner will be more creative and authentic if not influenced emotionally by their instructor. in a nutshell, a skillful teacher give their students the recipe and ingredients instead of giving them a ready-made meal.
Furthermore, it is completely normal for any individual to change their opinions about many arguments with time due to many factors. These swings between different opinions if revealed to your students could baffle them, moreover it may paint a grim picture about their teacher personality who is not able to adhere to one opinion. As a whole, they could not feel confident about their teacher attitudes anymore. It goes without saying that preserving the right image of a confident knowledgeable teacher is far important than any other factor in the education process. In other words, a discreet teacher would leave a distance between his or her personal opinions and the values he or she teaches in the class.
In conclusion, I do believe that teachers should not make their social or political views known to their students for two reasons, which are, they should not influence their students judgment and risk affecting their image in the eyes of their students.
- TPO-25 - Integrated Writing Task In 1938 an archaeologist in Iraq acquired a set of clay jars that had been excavated two years earlier by villagers constructing a railroad line. The vessel was about 2,200 years old. Each clay jay contained a copper cylin 73
- Tpo 28- integrated writing 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends. 71
- TPO-05 - Integrated Writing Task As early as the twelfth century A.D., the settlements of Chaco Canyon in New Mexico in the American Southwest were notable for their "great houses," massive stone buildings that contain hundreds of rooms and often stand th 71
- TPO-47 - Integrated Writing Task Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs. Many pterosaurs were very large, some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters. Paleontologists have long wondered 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 861, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...uenced emotionally by their instructor. in a nutshell, a skillful teacher give the...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, if, may, moreover, so, then, in conclusion, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1889.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 374.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05080213904 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65828790945 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.516042780749 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 567.0 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.555235834 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.117647059 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.76470588235 5.45110844103 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302020201013 0.236089414692 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107829798343 0.076458572812 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122947480492 0.0737576698707 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229062227877 0.150856017488 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10185563592 0.0645574589148 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.