People should work a fixed number of hours per week, and employers should not ask anybody to work more than this. Do you agree or disagree? Give your own opinion.
It is universally acknowledged that "work is worship". Therefore, everyone has to do either a job or run his own enterprise to earn his back and belly. Presently, it has been extremely debatable whether employees could be asked to do work for extra hour by the employers or not. Here, I would like to accord with the given statement.
There are multifarious points to endorse my view. First and foremost, fixed working schedule can be lucrative to get the best out of employee's potential and skills. To demonstrate, extra working hours could turn employee's efficiency into deficiency. They might ...
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-07-10 | saad_ga26@yahoo.com | 56 | view |
| 2017-12-13 | sherin rijo | 84 | view |
- Nowadays most parents put a lot of pressure on their children to succeed. What are the reasons for parents to do this? Does it have a positive or a negative effect on children in general? 90
- Competitiveness is considered a positive quality of the society How does competition affect individuals Is it a positive or a negative approach 38
- It is said that the teacher will be replaced by the computer in the future. Do you agree or disagree? 80
- The graph below shows the writing technology used by undergraduate students to prepare assignments at a university in 1970 1982 and 1994 42
- Some people agree that teachers should be strict with their students; others believe that teachers with friendly approach will achieve better results. Discuss and give your opinion. 90
Comments
Essay evaluation report
for extra hour
for extra hours
for an extra hour
working hours for the to find out
working hours for them to find out
long hours job could neither prove fruitful for employees nor for the working sector
long hours job could prove fruitful for neither employees nor for the working sector
Sentence: Undeniably, extra makes ordinary to extraordinary.
Description: An adjective is not usually followed by a verb, present tense, 3rd person singular
Suggestion: Refer to extra and makes
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 22 15
No. of Words: 327 350
No. of Characters: 1629 1500
No. of Different Words: 188 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.252 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.982 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.712 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 108 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 90 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 63 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 46 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 14.864 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.207 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.545 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.272 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.488 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.04 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...t the supreme outcomes from workers. Further emphasising on my point of view, overti...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, hence, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, as to, in contrast, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1694.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18042813456 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87419477661 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581039755352 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.5711659418 49.4020404114 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 77.0 106.682146367 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8636363636 20.7667163134 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.63636363636 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 3.4128256513 293% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25196467735 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0764277848721 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0666417023895 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158578789506 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0365859338544 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.17 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.