Is freedom of speech necessary in a free society?
Give reasons for your answer.
A growing number of people believe that right to speak freely remain truly fundamental to people in society whereas others claim that it becomes particularly harmful. I completely agree with the idea that right to express, speak and write is really necessary to protect everyone from all walks of life.
On the one hand, we must acknowledge that such rights can bring out voices of hatred, untruthful rumours and violence. To illustrate, in Nepal in the year 2002, there was breaking news which came through the main newspapers and televisions stating that it is one of the parts of an India which was stated by one of the top most Bollywood actors in a interview. When Nepalese population heard the news, it incited violent hatred against the Indian celebrities. As a result, the Indians living in Nepal were brutally attacked by native populations. Subsequently, it sparked widespread unrest and government was forced to deploy huge numbers of armed police to control them. Upon extensive investigation, they came to conclusion that there was no truth in the rumour.
However, on the other hand, it is undeniable that these entitlements are imperative in work place. Generally speaking, some employers are relatively impartial against their particular employees in respect of sexes, colours and religions. If they continue to dominate their workers, there are strong possibilities that these staff may tolerate it due to growing fear of losing job. Therefore, provided free rights, the common cultures such as genders, racial discriminations can be eliminated effectively.
In addition, given rights, social media can have huge impact in effective legislation. To demonstrate, In India, a powerful political leader was indirectly involved in kidnapping crime. However, police were not able to apprehend the elite leader. As the news was broadcasted of his direct involvement, population discovered the actual truth. So, the government was bound to arrest the culprit politicians due to constant pressure from public. If journalists were banned from free expression of writing and speech, the victim would not have gotten justice. Which is why we can say beyond doubt that first amendment proves absolutely indispensable.
It is logical to conclude that even though there are negatives about freedom of speech, it has remained unavoidable in prohibiting prejudice and shielding each people from all steps of their life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-03-14 | mabick_1527 | 62 | view |
- Discuss the advantage and disadvantage of giving international aid to poor countries. 84
- The following bar chart shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960, 1980 and 2000.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.Write at 90
- As child obesity becomes a serious health issue in today’s society, some people feel that TV commercials advertising junk food aimed at kids should not be shown before 9pm.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view? 74
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.The following bar chart gives statistics showing the aspects of quality of life in five countries.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.Wri 78
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities.Others,however,say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required.Discuss both views and give your own op 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 349, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...one of the top most Bollywood actors in a interview. When Nepalese population hea...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, really, so, therefore, whereas, as for, in addition, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2051.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 382.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36910994764 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90967732627 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 176.041082164 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628272251309 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 636.3 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0989963381 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.55 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0616604133626 0.244688304435 25% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0149103515882 0.084324248473 18% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0283919441435 0.0667982634062 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0377470285261 0.151304729494 25% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0265137231348 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.87 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 78.4519038076 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.