Parents are the life-long teachers to their children. As teachers are required to acquire qualification to teach, some people believe it is necessary for young people to learn how to be a qualified parent in school. Personally, I disagree with this approach. I think that young people does not need to learn the skills of being a good parent in school, rather they should learn it gradually after grown-up.
To begin with, to learn how to be a qualified parent in school is totally unreasonable. First, parenting involves a board range of displine, including basic displine like physic and biology and advanced displine like nutritionlism and psycology. All these subjects will take dozens of years to study. Second, the skill of being a good parent are mainly based on experience. Every child shows a unique character; therefore, parents must develop the accordingly specific approach toward it. Take myself for example, I was a extremely ill-tempered child when I was in my childhood. I think my parent will never meet another child like me. Thus, it is irrational to teach young people the parentle knowledge in school.
On the other hand, young people can learn this knowledge from experience and books. The experience of ourself and other people is an excellence resource. Some people even write their experience into books; therefore, young people can refer those parenting books. People who had negative memory of punishment will endeavor not to verbally or physically attack their children because they do not want to see their own children experience the same misery as they did. Therefore, young people will eventually become a qualified parent with experience gained from childhood till the birth of infant.
In conclusion, I oppose the idea that young people learn parent skill in school, which I think is a waste of time. Young people will become qualified parent as long as they learn parental skills from experience of their own and others.
- The chart and graph below give information about sales and share prices for Coca-Cola.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below.•You should write at least 150 words.•You should spend about 20 minutes on this task. 56
- The table below shows the water usage for different purposes in six different countries in 2001. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and way of life die out it is pointless to keep them alive.To what extent do you agree or disagree?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or kn 67
- Many people say the gap between rich and poor people is wider, as rich people become richer and poor people grow poorer.What problems could this situation cause and what measures can be done to address those problems? 85
- The number of overweight children in developed countries is increasing. Some people think this is due to problems such as the growing number of fast food outlets. Others believe that parents are to blame for not looking after their children's health.To wh 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 285, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...this approach. I think that young people does not need to learn the skills of bei...
^^
Line 3, column 521, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ward it. Take myself for example, I was a extremely ill-tempered child when I was...
^
Line 7, column 58, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to parent'
Suggestion: to parent
...oppose the idea that young people learn parent skill in school, which I think is a was...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, first, if, second, so, therefore, thus, for example, i think, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1645.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10869565217 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6689091188 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518633540373 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.0153645554 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.5789473684 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9473684211 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42105263158 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.360961719391 0.244688304435 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122295973968 0.084324248473 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0968679363734 0.0667982634062 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.24645965392 0.151304729494 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10491432908 0.056905535591 184% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.