The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given six pie charts indicate that 4 types of wasting water in 4 continents: America, Europe, Africa, Asia in the percentage of scale.
In general, it is immediately clear that the most prominent proportion is the usage of water in agriculture between Africa and Asia region whereas the consumption of water in industry and agriculture is popular in the United States and Europe.
To begin with, the water is used for industry in Europe, accounted for almost half. It is noticeable that most of the Amercian waste water for the industry but over 70 percent of water use present in South America. When it comes to agricultural use, more than 80 percent water in Africa and Asia while this percentage was only 32 percent in Europe and 39 percent in North Amerca. The percentage of spending water was 9 and 19 percent in Africa and South America respectively.
The waste of household in Europe occupied at 15 percent this ratio is over 2 times higher than in Central Asia.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-05 | Trương Bảo Kiên | 84 | view |
| 2023-06-05 | Trương Bảo Kiên | 73 | view |
- Some people beliebe that it is good to share to as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. discuss both these views an 89
- At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large numbr of young adults, compared with the nmber of older people. Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages? 78
- Some universities offer online courses as an alternative to classes delivered on campus. Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 85
- These days more fathers stay at home and take care of their children while mothers go out to work. What could be the reasons for this? Do you think it is a positive or a negative development? 78
- Write a report for university lecturer describing the information in the two graphs below 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, whereas, while, in general, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 811.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77058823529 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63112195996 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535294117647 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.114634146341 872% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8102522026 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.857142857 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2857142857 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143172902124 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0811191364434 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0467325627884 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0792868442304 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0596520761375 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.