The passage discusses three pieces of evidence found in a fossil of T.Rex fossil, which could probably indicate the remaining of soft tissues of the animal. However, the professor is dubious about these new findings authenticity and provides different reasons to refute the author's claims.
First, the author states that the soft and flexible organic matter which was detected in branching channels inside the fossil bones might be associated with the remaining of the animal's blood vessels. The professor, however, opposes this idea by referring to the bacterial activity as a possible source of the organic substance. According to the professor, after the animal is dead, some bacterias might colonize in the hollow channels inside the bones. These bacteria usually leave traces of organic material behind, and the detected organic matter in the fossils is probably from this source rather than animal's blood vessels.
Second, the passage notes that spherical cells, which contain iron might be the remains of the T.rex's blood cells. The professor opposes this idea as well. As the professor mentions, these identical spherical cells have been detected in the fossils of the primitive organisms which lack blood cells. Therefore, these cells could not be blood cells and might have a different origin, such as the residues of a kind of reddish mineral substance.
Finally, according to the passage, collagen, which is the primary element of the living bone tissues, has been detected in the analysis of the fossils. However, the professor states that due to the short life of collagen, it is very unlikely that this material has been preserved for such a long period of time. Thus, he suggests that the collagen might be transferred to the fossil from the human's skin once a researcher, for instance, has touched the sample.
- TPO-23 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In today’s world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct.Use specific reasons an 73
- TPO-46 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people.Use specific reasons and exam 73
- TPO-46 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people.Use specific reasons and exam 73
- Tpo25- integrated writing 73
- TPO-42 - Independent Writing Task Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 68, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... pieces of evidence found in a fossil of T.Rex fossil, which could probably indic...
^^
Line 2, column 72, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Rex
...ces of evidence found in a fossil of T.Rex fossil, which could probably indicate t...
^^^
Line 2, column 209, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'findings'' or 'finding's'?
Suggestion: findings'; finding's
...he professor is dubious about these new findings authenticity and provides different rea...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 287, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...referring to the bacterial activity as a possible source of the organic substance...
^^
Line 8, column 297, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...rial has been preserved for such a long period of time. Thus, he suggests that the collagen mi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, second, so, then, therefore, thus, well, as to, for instance, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1546.0 1373.03311258 113% => OK
No of words: 296.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22297297297 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48795491305 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503378378378 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 471.6 419.366225166 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.8900358673 49.2860985944 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.923076923 110.228320801 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7692307692 21.698381199 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.23076923077 7.06452816374 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339695779042 0.272083759551 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120227789097 0.0996497079465 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0870458057442 0.0662205650399 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194943771399 0.162205337803 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0424536032122 0.0443174109184 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 63.6247240618 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.