The three pie charts conclude the information of how yearly government's expense changed in Someland, in three different time points--1980,1990 and 2000.
It is clearly that education( higher education and K-12 education) is account for over half numbers of all spending in 1980 and 1990. However, the situation have changed in 2000 that transportation has token the second place instead of K-12 education but higher education still remain the first.
The government is likely to fund more on education( higher education and K-12 education) as 60%, 65% in 1980 and 1990. In contrast, environmental services seems not to be taken much seriously which only account for 4% of all in 1980; shows an increasing trend after two decades finally end up to 9% in 2000.
In 2000, while spending dropped slightly to 58% on education( higher education and K-12 education) there was a corresponding rise in expenditure on transportation such as subway and aircraft to 22%. Health and human resources was once increased from 14% (1980) to 20%(1990), and eventually end up to 10% in 2000. The expenditure on other things keep decreased over all times.
- some people say that all young people should have full time education until they are 18 years old To what extent do you agree or disagree 70
- Some say that because many people are living much longer, the age at which people retire from work should beraised considerably.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by local authorities in Someland in 1980, 1990 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Some say that because many people are living much longer, the age at which people retire from work should beraised considerably.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- some people say that all young people should have full-time education until they are 18 years old. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 239, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ly account for 4% of all in 1980; shows a increasing trend after two decades fina...
^
Line 7, column 61, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing dropped slightly to 58% on education higher education and K-12 education ther...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, second, so, still, while, as to, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 3.97073170732 403% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 952.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11827956989 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94921754851 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596774193548 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.445559171 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.875 5.23603664747 208% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16734821674 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0838345377703 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0869345561933 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13444516351 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0986203842227 0.0819641961636 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.