The chart below show the percentage of difference in income between men and women from 1978 to 2008.
1
The given chart illustrates some striking diversities between genders income during period from 1978 to 2008.
Overall, it is evident that the percentage of difference in income between males and females declined gradually in Japan, Us, UK and France. However, in Australia, there was a sudden rise in the proportion of income between genders from 1998 to 2008.
In 1978, the number of the difference income between genders decreased significantly to under 50% in Japan. At the same time, there was a marked drop in the percentage of income difference between men and women in US and UK by approximately 30%. On the one hand, in France and Australia, the figures considerably went down to nearly 20%.
In 2008, there was a substantial fall in the percentage of difference income between males and females in Japan by over 40%, followed by the US and UK with roughly 27%. Similarity, in France, the number of income between genders reduced steadily to generally 17%. On the other hand, there was a dramatic increase in the proportion of income between men and women by 25%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-14 | bigdaddy2804 | view | |
| 2023-04-14 | bigdaddy2804 | view | |
| 2021-08-15 | phg_phg | 84 | view |
| 2020-05-08 | Munn Nguyen | 84 | view |
| 2020-02-15 | khoibeo3g | 73 | view |
- the table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999. 73
- When visiting foreign countries some people think that it is an advantage to learn their culture and tradition How do you think people can learn other culture and tradition Why do you think that some people are interested in learning those tradition and c 91
- the table show information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000. 78
- the charts below show information about USA marriage and divorce rates between 1970 and 2000, and the marital status of adult Americans in two of the years. 73
- Education for young people is important in many countries. However, the others think government should spend more money for education in adult population who cannot read and write. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 896.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92307692308 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75296110244 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.7507634705 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 99.5555555556 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.440956382975 0.215688989381 204% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.188826853828 0.103423049105 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0858610194005 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.290692820631 0.15604864568 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0105401763284 0.0819641961636 13% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.