The presented line chart illustrates the proportion of income gap from both genders during 30 years period between 1978 and 2008.
In general, the percent of the difference between male and female salaries diminished. In Australia, nevertheless, the wage disparity between men and women widened after 1998.
The graph indicates that in 1978, there was a difference of almost 50 percent in earnings between men and women in Japan, compared to about 34 percent in the United States. Both countries eventually experienced a steady decline in these figures, with the proportion of gaps in 2008 being over 40% and over 28% respectively.
In both the UK and France, the income difference between men and women has narrowed. The economic disparity between men and women in such nations was lower than in Japan or the United States. The percentage drop remained constant, with 27 percent in the UK and 18 percent in France in 2008, down from around 30 percent and slightly under 20 percent in the UK and France, respectively. Australia, on the other hand, had the smallest income gap in 1978. While it stayed at 8% until 1998, it then soared to 24 percent at the end of the period, surpassing France's record.
- The chart below gives information about levels of education by age range in the UK in 2010 55
- Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language Do you think this is a positive or negative social development 84
- The table below gives information of weekly level of consumption by different age groups in ordinary milk and butter healthy alternative HA milk and butter in one European country Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and 84
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places 78
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled tea and pineapples in 2010 and 2015 in five European countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 79
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, nevertheless, so, then, while, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1008.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94117647059 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66484583164 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558823529412 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 294.3 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.3288698032 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.8 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346076137203 0.215688989381 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142107994097 0.103423049105 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0940484936186 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217780672142 0.15604864568 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0406126130931 0.0819641961636 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.