The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart compares the rate of British donors by some age groups in the years 1990 and 2010.
It is clear that the percentages of who are from 18 to 50 giving money to charity fell gradually. By contrast, the other age groups saw a slight increase in the rates of people donating.
In 1990, the rate of British donors aged 36-50 was highest, at 42 %. 17 % of the youngest age range donated to charity compared to 31 % for the 26-35 year-olds. The percentage of people of the 51-65 age profile giving money was 35 %, which was 3% higher than that of those over 65.
In 2010, British experienced a gradual drop in the rate of donors of 18-25 age bracket, approximately 7%. There were reductions in the percentages of donors of the 26-36 and 36-50 age range, at 24 % and 35 % respectively. While the level of people of the 51-65 age group making donations rose significantly to under 40 %, that of those over 65 increased to 35%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-20 | Jasmineeee | 61 | view |
| 2019-05-20 | Jasmineeee | 67 | view |
- The chart below shows global sales of the top five mobile phone brands between 2009 and2013.! 84
- Computers have made a better and safer world. Do you agree or disagree? 67
- The charts below show household spending patterns in two countries between 1980 and 2008. 73
- Computers have made a better and safer world. Do you agree or disagree? 67
- One of the consequences of improved medical care is that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 760.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.49704142012 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55941787028 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.585798816568 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 217.8 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 19.4504752552 43.030603864 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.4444444444 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7777777778 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.44444444444 5.23603664747 28% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248531164605 0.215688989381 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111315138663 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0483296600496 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17052258574 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0395393743734 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.82 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.15 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.