The chart illustrates how many percents of British people by age range give money to charity between 1990 and 2010.
In the first glance, it was noticeable that in 1990, the highest percentage group people who donate money to charity was 36-50, which was over 40%. The youngster in the age of 18-25 had the least percentage, which was only approximately 17%. However, the age range from 26-50 and those who were over 65 had almost the same percentage.
As the chart demonstrates, in 2010, people who were aged 51-65 had given more money to charity, which increased by 4%. Donation from the group age of 36-50 had decreased, while people who were over 65 had increased, and met the same percentage. Not to mention, young people not only remained the least, still had dipped to only 6%.
To sum up, it was evident that old ages were willing to donate than those young ones.
- People living in large cities face several problems. What are these problems? Should governments encourage people to move to smaller towns? 73
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of people using various form of transport in France 61
- The table below gives information on internet use in six categories by age group 89
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- graduates who cannot find work in their field should be advised to take a second degree rather than taking a job that does not interest them.to what extent do you agree with this statement? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, still, while, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 726.0 965.302439024 75% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68387096774 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35959748944 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554838709677 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 212.4 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 20.7722019776 43.030603864 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.75 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.375 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179507859302 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0957047832462 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106649582279 0.0843802449381 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14470211108 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128314361234 0.0819641961636 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.02 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.