Writing Task 1
The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee ad bananas in 1999 and 2004 in 5 countries.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The tables indicate the turnover from coffee and banana labeled Fairtrade in the year 1999 and 2004 in 5 Europe countries namely UK, Switzerland, Denmark, Belgium, and Sweden.
As can be seen from the tables, the sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee in all countries followed an upward pattern. Meanwhile, when it comes to bananas, Sweden and Denmark pursued a contradictory trend, noticing a decline.
The most striking feature can be seen in the growth of the coffee turnover in the UK. It started at 1.5 million of euro in 1999, skyrocketing more than 13 times to 20 million in 2004, becoming the biggest. The number of euros gained from coffee in Switzerland doubled from 3 to 6 million in 2004 while the 3 others experienced a subtle increase to more than 1 million euros.
As regard bananas, Switzerland was still the countries having the highest turnover, with 15 million in 1999 and 47 million in 2004. Meanwhile, the sales in UK and Belgium, ranking 4th and 5th correspondingly in 1999, both surged more than 5 times, leaving the others at the bottom of the list.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-02-10 | jicheoltrash | 78 | view |
- the number of travelers to different airports in NY City from 1995 to 2000 89
- score by teams by season from 2002 to 2005 84
- the hobbies of British people from 2003 to 2015 78
- The energy consumption by Fuel from 1980-2030 78
- the electricity generated in France and Germany from all sources and renewables in Germany and France in 2009 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 45, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...an be seen from the tables, the sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee in all countri...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 892.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84782608696 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87696673915 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570652173913 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.114634146341 872% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.1949395595 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.5 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.5 5.23603664747 29% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132989335493 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0620702698132 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0518800645686 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.095535520445 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0480467092899 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.