the consumption of fast food by Australian teenagers
Overall, the number of Fish and chips and Hamburgers consumed by teenagers shared a similar pattern while the consumption off pizza followed an opposite trend from 1975 to 2000.
In 1975, both the quantity of Fish and chips and Hamburgers started with roughly 10 before increasing swiftly. The consumption of Hamburgers rocketed to around 80 by 1985 while the same number was achieved by Fish and chips 10 years later. After, the number of times Hamburger eaten continued rising with a slower speed to the first rank of 100 in 2000 (the winner) when the number of Fish and chips consumed stayed unchanged at 80 (2nd rank).
When it came to Pizza, in 1975, the times of Pizza eaten was 100 (the biggest number), which proceeded a fluctuation around 90 in the following 10 years. Since then, the consumption of Pizza witnessed an unstoppable decrease, hitting the bottom line of approximately 40 at the end of the period (the lowest).
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-12 | wholemilk | 73 | view |
| 2024-09-19 | hien3112 | 84 | view |
| 2024-08-14 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 11 | view |
| 2024-06-19 | unstoppable | 67 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
- The energy consumption by Fuel from 1980-2030 78
- score by teams by season from 2002 to 2005 84
- the electricity generated in France and Germany from all sources and renewables in Germany and France in 2009 89
- the number of travelers to different airports in NY City from 1995 to 2000 89
- the consumption of fast food by Australian teenagers 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 160, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...rienced a fluctuating decrease, hitting a lowest of approximately 40 at the end o...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 685.0 965.302439024 71% => OK
No of words: 142.0 196.424390244 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82394366197 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.45201032557 3.73543355544 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64606057755 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 80.0 106.607317073 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56338028169 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 194.4 283.868780488 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1412469126 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.166666667 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.16666666667 5.23603664747 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0714710568818 0.215688989381 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0401642446596 0.103423049105 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0434023654149 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0608937677673 0.15604864568 39% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0375710842025 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.