Some universities offer online courses as an alternative to classes delivered on campus. Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
Selecting the most appropriate educational method for university students has been gaining a great deal of public attention in recent years. Although the proposal of employing online courses to education system appears legitimate, it actually has many downsides.
On the one hand, there are some advantages when university students take part in online courses. First, due to an increase in online courses, students in destitute regions are likely to approach academic subjects and learning enviroment and like other students with better living standard. This means that these students would still be equipped with academic skills and empirical knowledge after graduation, increasing their likelihood of finding a good job and higher status. Second, online courses offered by universities is proved to be not as expensive as classes delivered on campus due to not incurring expenditures for material maintenance.. If low-income students decide to attend university, tuition in addition to campus fees must be unaffordable.
On the other hand, applying virtual courses to educate students can also be fraught with some negative consequences. The first reason is that e-learning can be a hindrance to the development of learners’ soft skills especially teamwork and restrict their opportunity of practice. It can be implied that if they are not required to put their academic knowledge into practice, they inevitably can not accumulate sufficient practical experiences, which is a constraint of finding a promising job. Another reason is that studying by dint of courses on the Internet is associated with lack of regular interaction and consultation with professors. Subsquently, students are susceptible to not comprehending the lectures which acts as s deterrent for their making headway.
In conclusion, i believe that e-learning would hamper the development of both undergraduate and postgraduate students in terms of knowledge acquisition and employment prospects.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-13 | mikeboss268 | 89 | view |
| 2019-10-10 | Billynguyen1225 | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-10 | Lê Thị Hoài Như | 89 | view |
| 2019-08-19 | hakinguyen | 89 | view |
| 2019-07-15 | MrDucPhD | 89 | view |
- The table displays trends concerning the amounts of fast food consumed in Melbourne Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Some people think that studying from the past teaches us nothing about today’s life. Others argue that the history is a valuable source of information. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 61
- Consumers are faced with increasing numbers of advertisements from competing companies. To what extent do you think consumers influenced by advertisements. What can be done to protect them 61
- Long distance flight uses more fuel than cars and brings pollution to the environment. We should discourage non-essential flight rather than limit the use of cars. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- Many people say the gap between rich and poor people is wider as rich people become richer and poor people grow poorer What problems could this situation cause and what measures can be done to address those problems 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 646, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...ng expenditures for material maintenance.. If low-income students decide to attend...
^^
Line 4, column 16, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...r their making headway. In conclusion, i believe that e-learning would hamper th...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, if, second, so, still, in addition, in conclusion, of course, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1685.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.71186440678 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17319642069 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603389830508 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.0814774371 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.615384615 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6923076923 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.84615384615 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16974228258 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0620363356083 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0675714896971 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.087318076039 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0579718770838 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.19 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.