the graph below shows information about consumption of spreads from 1989 to 2007. summarise information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
The line graphs illustrate the amount of three spreads that consumers ate between 1981 to 2007.
Overall, there was a dramatically change in each category. Both in consumption of butter and margarine, the trends decreased, while that of low fat and reduced spreads had a significant rise.
There was a slight increase in the amount of butter that people consumed, from 140 grams to 160 grams over 5-year period. After that, this figure fell considerably to 50 grams in 2007.
The figure of consumption of Margarine had a slight increase of 10 grams between 1981 and 1991. Then, after remained stably over 5-year period, this number fell steadily from 100 grams in 1996 to only 40 grams in 2007. In contrast, consumers were prone on low fat and reduced spreads. There was a sharp rise in the figure of that, from only 10 grams in 1996 to just over 80 grams in 2001, though this figure had a slight drop to 70 grams in 2007.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-02-15 | Huyen Trang | 56 | view |
- the pie charts show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010. 73
- the table below highlight data on the number of travellers using three major British airport between 1998 and 2003. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 33
- the expenditure on fast food by income groups, UK 1990. 61
- the table below highlight data on the number of travellers using three major British airport between 1998 and 2003 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 87
- the graph below gives info about car ownership in Britain from 1971 to 2007. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 20, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('dramatically') instead an adjective, or a noun ('change') instead of another adjective.
...tween 1981 to 2007. Overall, there was a dramatically change in each category. Both in consumption o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 761.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.61212121212 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41247142273 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 82.0 106.607317073 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.49696969697 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 209.7 283.868780488 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.5651200497 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.5555555556 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.23603664747 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0833148768165 0.215688989381 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0396573729266 0.103423049105 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0310420400334 0.0843802449381 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0633102888838 0.15604864568 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0265681157702 0.0819641961636 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.2329268293 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.54 8.06136585366 81% => OK
difficult_words: 21.0 40.7170731707 52% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.