Internet users as percentage of population.
The line graph illustrates the proportion of people who used the internet in three countries: the USA, Canada, Mexico during the period from 1999 to 2009.
At first glance, it is clear that there was an upward trend in all three nations throughout the given period. In addition, the percentage of internet users in Canada was the highest in comparison with that of the USA and Mexico at the end of the period.
Looking at the detail, as regarding Mexico, the number of Internet users began at the lowest position among three countries in 1999, at around 5%. This was followed by a considerable increase in remaining years, at about 25% in 2005 and only 40% in 2009, making it considerably lower than the others. Likewise, there was also a rapid climb in the proportion of Internet user in the USA, with 20% in the first year, the went up by around 50% in 2005 and got the second highest figure in 2009, at approximately 80%.
As for Canada, nearly 10% of Canadians used the Internet in 1999. The figure increased sharply in the same proportion as Canada in 2005 before reaching the high of 80% in 2009.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-26 | Wardiati Yusuf | 67 | view |
| 2024-02-26 | Wardiati Yusuf | 67 | view |
| 2024-02-25 | Wardiati Yusuf | 67 | view |
| 2023-10-17 | lynnnn | 67 | view |
| 2023-10-15 | caychanhvang | 70 | view |
- The diagram below shows the life cycle of a frog. 56
- The pictures illustrate the changes in Shipsmouth between 1995 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 65
- the expenditure on fast food by income groups, UK 1990. 56
- the diagrams show how the bee makes honey and the stages in the production of honey summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features 89
- This pictures below show how tomato ketchup is made Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, likewise, look, regarding, second, so, as for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 908.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58585858586 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48722888365 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550505050505 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2833712591 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.5 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.875 5.23603664747 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17289340057 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0840004896578 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0858833220572 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102918741076 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0447053154655 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.64 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.