The line graphs illustrate the amount of three spreads that consumers ate between 1981 to 2007.
Overall, there was a dramatical change in each category. Both in consumption of butter and margarine, the trends decreased, while that of low fat and reduced spreads had a significant rise.
There was a slight increase in the amount of butter that people consumed, from 140 grams to 160 grams over 5-year period. After that, this figure fell considerably to 50 grams in 2007.
The figure of consumption of Margarine had a slight increase of 10 grams between 1981 and 1991. Then, after remained stably over 5-year period, this number fell steadily from 100 grams in 1996 to only 40 grams in 2007. In contrast, consumers were prone on low fat and reduced spreads. There was a sharp rise in the figure of that, from only 10 grams in 1996 to just over 80 grams in 2001, though this figure had a slight drop to 70 grams in 2007.
- the graph below shows the average growth in domestic products in wealthy countries countries that have adopted a global approach to business and countries that have not writing a report 85
- the graph compares employment rates in three sectors of the economy, in the Uk, 2000 - 2010.summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant 73
- as well as making money businesses also have social responsibilities Do you agree or disagree 87
- This chart shows the top eight destination for newlywed British couples in 2010. The results come from a survey of 5000 couples. 56
- The pie charts show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 759.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37994374543 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 82.0 106.607317073 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.49696969697 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 208.8 283.868780488 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.8559038016 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.3333333333 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.23603664747 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0833148768165 0.215688989381 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0396573729266 0.103423049105 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0310420400334 0.0843802449381 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0633102888838 0.15604864568 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0265681157702 0.0819641961636 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.2329268293 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.4 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.54 8.06136585366 81% => OK
difficult_words: 21.0 40.7170731707 52% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.