the graph shows the oil production capacity in 6 countries between 1990 and 2010.
The bar chart illustrates how many millions of barrels per day oil were produced and their changes in 6 countries throughout a 20-year period from 1990 to 2010.
Overall, It is obvious that there were upward trends in oil production of all 6 nations, particularly the most significant increase can be seen in Saudi Arabia. Another interesting point is that the amount of oil produced was the highest in Saudi Arabia and the lowest in Qatar over the period in question.
In 1990, the amount of oil produced in Saudi Arabia was over 8 million of barrels per day. This was followed by a steady rise, reaching a peak of over 14 million of barrels per day. By contrast, only a half million of barrels per day were produced in Qatar in 1990, then the figure almost remained stable at the end of the period after a marginal increase in 2000.
Looking at the oil production in the other countries, there was a slight increase. In 1990, the figure in Iraq started at about 3 million of barrels per day compared to around 2 million of barrels per day in the other three countries. The amount of oil produced in the UAE did not see a rise in 2000 like the others but the figure peaked at over 4 million of barrels per day in Iran and at almost 4 million of barrels per day in Iraq, Kuwait and the UAE.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | pateldhruv1708 | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | shayma | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-21 | CharanpreetSingh | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-20 | exdiscipulus | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | Tan Thao | 100 | view |
- the graph shows UK acid rain emissions, from 4 different sectors between 1990 to 2007. 67
- the charts show the number of marriages and divorces in the USA, 1970-2000 and Marital status of adults Americans, 1970 and 2000. 73
- the graph shows UK acid rain emissions, from 4 different sectors between 1990 to 2007. 67
- the graph and table show info about water use worldwide and water consumption in 2 countries. 73
- the graph below shows information about consumption of spreads from 1989 to 2007. summarise information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1053.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 241.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.36929460581 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40540102656 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.46887966805 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 317.7 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8113238646 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.0 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7777777778 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.11111111111 5.23603664747 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121340253251 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0705659162972 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0524447742393 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0963614462339 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.044233306704 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.36 11.4140731707 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.