The table below gives information about the average annual spending of university students in 3 different countries.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The give table illustrates the percentage of money which university students in country A, B and C spend on living cost each year.
Overall, the total spending in country A is the highest while accommodation and food costs are spent on commonly by student in three countries.
As can be seen from the table, the percentage of accommodation cost in country A is spent nearly a half of the total spending, but the figure in country C is the lowest with 30% among three countries. In contrast, the proportion of food cost in country C is almost a third while that of country A just fluctuated around 22%.
When it comes to leisure, students’ expenditure in country B constitutes the highest proportion (23%) and is nearly twice as much as that in country C (12%). Among the three countries, students’ in country C has the highest percentage of budget spent on books (21%) while the spending for others in country A is the highest one.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-02-15 | Vuong Linh | 91 | view |
- The table below gives information about the average annual spending of university students in 3 different countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 91
- The chart below show the percentage of difference in income between men and women from 1978 to 2008 69
- Studies suggested that nowadays children watch much more television than they did in the past and spend less time on active or creative things. What are the reasons? What measures should be taken to encourage children to spend more time on active or creat 61
- the pie chart below show units of electricity production by fuel source in australia and france in 1980 and 2000. 56
- the bar graph shows the global sales (in billions of dollars) of different types of digital games between 2000 and 2006. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, third, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 782.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73939393939 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93496073063 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 83.0 106.607317073 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.50303030303 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 225.0 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.114634146341 872% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 26.2979720384 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.333333333 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0897252781445 0.215688989381 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0610967558291 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0539094311792 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.081034478197 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0531880664383 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.