The two column charts show the percentage of food and other items bought by 3 European countries in 1998 and 2008
The given charts demonstrate the expense people in 3 Europe nations spent in foods and other goods between 1998 and 2008.
It is evident that people in Norway spent bought the largest percent of food while Poland residents mostly bought other items. UK was the coutries where people bought the least food and other items.
In term of food, in 1998, Norway bought the biggest propotion of food, at exactly 15%, followed by Poland where nearly 8% of food was bought. UK was the nations that people only bought 5% of food. After 10 - year period, the percentage of food bought by 3 countries increased. The food bought by Norway and Poland was triple, at aroung 45% and 30% respectively. Although the proportion of food in UK rose five fold, at 25% but UK was a country that bought the smallest number of food.
On the other hand, in 1998, Poland citizens bought the largest number of other items, which was 35%. This number in Norway and UK was only 7% and 3% respectively. In 2008, the percentage of other items bought in Poland reached 35%, followed by Norway at 15% and UK at 18%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-17 | minhngoc_8 | view | |
| 2021-11-17 | minhngoc_8 | view | |
| 2021-11-17 | minhngoc_8 | view | |
| 2021-11-17 | minhngoc_8 | 80 | view |
| 2018-03-11 | Terlan Kazimli | 73 | view |
- The following bar chart shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960 1980 and 2000 76
- Some people think that men and women have different qualities. Therefore, some certain jobs are suitable for men and some jobs are suitable for women. To what extent do you agree or disargee? 56
- The table below gives information about the average annual spending of university students in three different countries 67
- The graph below shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegestables, sugars and sweets and carbonated drinks between 1979 and 2009.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features amd make comparisons where relevant 86
- Nowadays more and more young people hold the important positions in the government. Some people think that is a good thing while others argue that it is not suitable . Discuss both views and give your own opinion 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 891.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.56923076923 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28235791292 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.476923076923 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 241.2 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.7077427494 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.0 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7272727273 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.63636363636 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328422371267 0.215688989381 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155436213988 0.103423049105 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0645412290866 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21904937925 0.15604864568 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0237073070187 0.0819641961636 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 13.2329268293 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 88.06 61.2550243902 144% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.2 10.3012195122 50% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.93 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.99 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.