Some people think that international car-free days are effective way of reducing air pollution. Others think there are some other ways. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In the most recent times, owning a car is just like any other possessions being purchased at hand. Arguments have risen as to whether approve the world car-free day event to numerous nations or to reject the proposal, rather, suggest of alternative ideas in reducing air pollution problems.
There have been various attempts by environmentalists in taking part to campaign on improving the condition of the biosphere. These includes among several others, a one day no use of motor vehicles. If this will be conducted, people will be able to understand more about the adverse effects on the degradation if the ecosystem. Hence, an initiative to offer solutions to this are administered. Moreover, individuals will be encouraged to find alternative mode of transport such as cycling or even walking. Dependence of citizens in the use of cars thereby, will be decreased.
On the contrary, some people claim that there are still other methods to help alleviate pollution concerns. One of which is to enforce strict compliance to rules and regulations when it comes to car ownership responsibility. Violation to local ordinances are common, smoke belching in particular, which adds up to the unwanted gases in the atmosphere. Apart from this, the government limits the presence of all automobiles in roads through specific color or number coding schemes. This law to some degree is effective because it also ease traffic congestion.
In my opinion, I support the car-free day for the reason that, it incurs innumerable benefits to travelers. It is only a single day event of the year that could provide immense positive impact to the environment. To sum up, citizens of all nations have primary responsibility in protecting the earth and its inhabitants.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-17 | amanda.mosby | 89 | view |
| 2017-03-03 | Fiona Joanna Cruz | 52 | view |
- Companies can progress by good communion and collaboration between the employers and staff Good incentives individualistic approach recognition and a pat on the back for the successful completion of a project can enhance the enthusiasm and can lead the co 90
- Some people believe that the law changes human behaviour. Do you agree or disagree with the statement? Support your point of view with details from your own experiences, observations or reading. 77
- Travel to study is over rated, we have brilliant scholars who studied locally. Is travel really required for higher studies? 85
- Many small local shops are closing as they are unable to compete with large supermarkets in the area How does this affect local communities How could this situation be improved 85
- Some people think the purpose of education is to prepare the future workforce and make good members of society. Others think the purpose of education should lead to self-fulfillment. What is your opinion? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 121, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...purchased at hand. Arguments have risen as to whether approve the world car-free day event to...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 535, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'eases'?
Suggestion: eases
...ome degree is effective because it also ease traffic congestion. In my opinion, I...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, moreover, so, still, apart from, as to, in particular, such as, in my opinion, on the contrary, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1475.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19366197183 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03761015949 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.654929577465 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.707361777 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.1875 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.75 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171734939757 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0462602604118 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0508348392023 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.095737761759 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0378880387024 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.