This table shows how many people (in millions) used different form public transport in Milan between 2010 and 2014
This table shows the rise in passenger transport in Milan from 2010 to 2014 in the bus, train, tram, taxi and metro networks. There was increased usage of all 5 forms of transport during this period and the metro was used more than any other mode of transport.
In 2010 there were just 7.3 million passengers using public transport in Milan, but by 2014 this figure had approximately doubled to over 14 million. The numbers rose for each form of transport every year with the exception of buses in 2011 when the figure dropped slightly from 1 million to 0.8 million. The pattern of change was mostly steady with the two greatest changes being the rise in bus usage in 2012 and metro usage in 2011, where there was an increase of around 1 million in both cases.
The greatest number of passengers used the metro and trains, the figures rising from 3 million to 5 million and 1.4 million to 3.6 million respectively. While more people used trams at the start of this period, bus transport had become more popular by 2013. Taxis accounted for the fewest number of journeys at 0.6 to one million.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-03-23 | kingnight153 | 73 | view |
| 2017-03-22 | kingnight153 | 72 | view |
- The two column charts below show the percentage of food and other items bought by three European countries in 1998 and 2008 77
- The charts below show the main methods of transportation for people travelling to one university for work or study in 2004 and 2009 88
- The table below shows the income and expenditure of Harckley Hall, a public place for hiring over the period of three years. 84
- The diagram illustrates the process that is used to manufacture bricks for the building industry 78
- In recent years tourists have paid attention to preserving both the culture and environment of the places they visit However some people think that it is impossible to be a responsible tourist To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 49
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 206, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
...e for each form of transport every year with the exception of buses in 2011 when the figure dropped s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...e of around 1 million in both cases. The greatest number of passengers used the ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 903.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60714285714 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30365476605 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561224489796 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.114634146341 872% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.9850610563 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.875 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.25 5.23603664747 24% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33823153732 0.215688989381 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1583243549 0.103423049105 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101729736786 0.0843802449381 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241795093122 0.15604864568 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0430761909363 0.0819641961636 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.