BEE NEST
The reading and the lecture both discuss whether the nest inside the tree have created by bees or not. The reading says that the structures, which have discovered in Arizona, it is not relating to the Bees. However, the professor refutes this argument and states that there are several reasons that Bees have been about 200 million years ago.
First, there are no fossils of actual Bees. According to the reading, the first fossils of bees return to 100 million years ago and it is not accepted that bee have live 200 million years ago. In contrast, the lecturer refutes this statement by saying the trees which have been at that time could not produce resin, then bees fossils could not remain since that time.
In addition, no existing flowering plants 200 million years ago. The passage claims that bees and flowering plants have a special relationship and in fact the bees use these plants as food, while the first flowering plants have existed from 125 million years ago. However, the professor states that although the bees and flowering plants have close relationship, bees at that time have used other plants as food. Indeed, the consumers of flowering plans by bees have been starting since the evolutionary plant age.
Finally, the discovered nests have a similarity with modern bee nests, but they are different in details. The reading says that for instance chambers of modern bee nest have another pattern relative to the fossil structure. On the other hand, the speaker argues that by analyzing the fossil, the experts have found they are the same even in details. For example, both modern and old nest are water proof.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-07 | YasamanEsml | 88 | view |
| 2023-08-04 | sahel | 76 | view |
| 2023-06-29 | Vivian Chang | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-18 | reza_fattahi | 80 | view |
| 2023-02-13 | zaid | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The reading and the lecture both discuss...
^^^^
Line 2, column 344, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... have been about 200 million years ago. First, there are no fossils of actual Be...
^^^
Line 5, column 393, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: waterproof
...r example, both modern and old nest are water proof.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, so, then, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in contrast, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1363.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 278.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90287769784 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25375429355 2.5805825403 87% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.489208633094 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 405.9 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3956702641 49.2860985944 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.3571428571 110.228320801 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8571428571 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.28571428571 7.06452816374 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31671525468 0.272083759551 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130532459598 0.0996497079465 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105865742403 0.0662205650399 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210227278367 0.162205337803 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0612895695027 0.0443174109184 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.3589403974 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 63.6247240618 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.