Some people believe that hobbies need to be difficult to be enjoyable.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Depending on the individual's choice, hobbies can be either easy or hard. In the leisure time, some people enjoy doing simple hobbies which need less physical or mental stress, and others love to challenge themselves. While I accept that easy hobbies can be fun, I would argue that the more challenged we do, the more enjoyable moment we have in life.
On the one hand, many people enjoy easier entertaining activities. This is because they don't feel like hazardous, and these hobbies don't require demanding experience. An example of this activity that is easy for most people is singing. It doesn't need any equipment, and individuals can sing whenever they want. It can be great fun for those people. Another hobby that I believe exciting and frugal is reading. In my opinion, reading can grip people with an amazing tale, they can choose to lose themselves in a fictional word or learn more about their own world. Despite being straightforward, reading is a good way to relax people's mind.
On the other hand, to create many great memories, some individuals love to do something escape from the busy daily life and want to challenge themselves crossing their limitations. For instance, playing guitar is a hobby that requires lots of patience and practice. I remember learning to play guitar when I was a beginner, my fingers hurt all the time because of sharp strings and it was really hard to understand tabs, but now I'm truly passionate about the guitar. Not only does playing guitar calms me down when I'm stressed out, but composing tunes on my own can also provide me creative satisfaction. I believe that some hobbies should be physically or mentally challenged because the feeling achievement is happier and greater.
In conclusion, easy hobbies can be fun and relaxing, but difficult hobbies can make our life's moment more memorable and enjoyable.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-13 | positiveann2000@yahoo.com | 61 | view |
- The chart below shows a comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in 1995 and 2005. 67
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010. 56
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010. 61
- The given graph shows the consumption of fast food in the UK (per week) from 1970 to 1990. 73
- The graphs below provide information on global population figures and figures for urban populations in different world regions. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 89, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...aining activities. This is because they dont feel like hazardous, and these hobbies ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 133, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... feel like hazardous, and these hobbies dont require demanding experience. An exampl...
^^^^
Line 2, column 240, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... is easy for most people is singing. It doesnt need any equipment, and individuals can...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 430, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...really hard to understand tabs, but now Im truly passionate about the guitar. Not ...
^^
Line 3, column 516, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
... does playing guitar calms me down when Im stressed out, but composing tunes on my...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, really, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1547.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94249201278 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66809318206 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594249201278 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7390743656 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.0 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4117647059 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.58823529412 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242061000742 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0836953546676 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0625901648174 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163735499388 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0446482529354 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.