The pie charts show the average consumption of food in the world in 2008 compared to two countries: China and India.
The provided pie charts compare food consumption in China and India with the world figure for the year 2008.
It can be seen that processed food consisted the most proportion of all consumed food in the countries and the world in 2008; this figure was the most in the world average at 41 per cent, whereas convenient food constituted 34 and 39 per cents in China and India, respectively. Consumption of vegetables and fruits in China was at 32 per cent which was close to the world’s average at 29 per cent in 2008. In contrast, green and fruits were consumed significantly less compared to the latter figures at 23 per cent in the same year. Interestingly, the proportion of consumed animal products was nearly similar in India and the world average at 27 and 26 per cents, while this figure was substantially less in China at only 15 per cent in the given year. Also, there was a notable difference in the proportion of consumed nuts and seeds; the world average was as much as 4 per cent, whereas this figure was much higher in both China and India at 19 and 11 per cents, respectively.
The given pie charts show there was a substantial difference in food consumption between the world average and China and India in 2008.
- The maps below show the village of Stokeford in1930 and 2010. 67
- The diagrams show a structure that is used to generate electricity from wave power. 73
- The bar chart below gives information about vehicle ownership in China. 61
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. Discuss both these views 56
- The diagram below shows the typical stages of consumer goods manufacturing, including the process by which information is fed back to earlier stages to enable adjustment. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1016.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61818181818 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68258848721 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.436363636364 0.547539520022 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.0802184838 43.030603864 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.142857143 112.824112599 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.4285714286 22.9334400587 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340483246663 0.215688989381 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.241014422155 0.103423049105 233% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.192809967272 0.0843802449381 229% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.418868202166 0.15604864568 268% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.163089787202 0.0819641961636 199% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.93 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.11 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.