The author of the issue states that critical judgment is of use only when it is from someone who is an expert in that field. Due to controversial nature of this problem, there is not a general argument for this issue. I am, however, to a great extend, against the statement. In the ensuing paragraphs, convincing reasons will be delineated.
For one thing, a lot of innovative ideas come from those who dare to try but may not be an expert. An expert is easily be fettered by his experience and could not broaden his imagination and try some new thing. For example, an old professor in mathematics may consider a math problem, like to Four-Color problem, unsolvable based on his long-time research. And he may advise his student to give up this topic and focus on other ones that seem to be more fruitful. However, this judgement may not be all the case. Some young researchers who master the skill in computer and dare to try may find a new way to prove a math theory with computer, breaking the traditional limitation. In this case, expert's judgment may fetter our imagination and cause us to miss the opportunity to do something very unprecedented.
For another, expert could not precisely judge or predict a lot of things in such a changeable society. For example, in the field of fashion, we could not expect what may be the trend for next season. In this case, a wise fashion company should not rely totally on the expert to predict what may be the trend in the next season but try to lead the fashion by innovative design based on reliable marketing information and scientific analysis.
However, what I have allude to above does not draw the who picture. For example, with his experience, a expert's judgment maybe more practical and safer. For example, ideas comes from a someone new to this field maybe innovative, but it may be not practical since he lacks the experience the judge what is viable and what is not.
In conclusion, according to the reasons discussed above, I reiterate that not just the critical judgement from expert in that field is useful. A lot of innovative and more valuable judgement may comes from someone who dare to image even though he may not an expert in that field.
- In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement 50
- TPO-17 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Most advertisements make products seem much better then they really are.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.Be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position. 58
- College and university should require all faculty to spend time working outside the academic world in profession relevant to the courses they teach.Should colleges and university faculty be encouraged to work outside the academic field which they have rel 90
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station."Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this period, most of the complaint 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 22, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'alluded'.
Suggestion: alluded
...ific analysis. However, what I have allude to above does not draw the who picture....
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 103, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ture. For example, with his experience, a experts judgment maybe more practical a...
^
Line 7, column 105, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'experts'' or 'expert's'?
Suggestion: experts'; expert's
...re. For example, with his experience, a experts judgment maybe more practical and safer...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 184, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'a' or 'someone'?
Suggestion: a; someone
...nd safer. For example, ideas comes from a someone new to this field maybe innovative, but...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, for example, in conclusion, for one thing
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1826.0 2235.4752809 82% => OK
No of words: 391.0 442.535393258 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67007672634 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44676510885 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65839769708 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.468030690537 0.4932671777 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 585.0 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.740449438202 135% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4686278865 60.3974514979 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.1052631579 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5789473684 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.57894736842 5.21951772744 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232493815753 0.243740707755 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0846269853663 0.0831039109588 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0821769242219 0.0758088955206 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15982596006 0.150359130593 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0630378707576 0.0667264976115 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 14.1392134831 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 12.1639044944 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 100.480337079 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.