The shocking phenomenon of investment of money in to sports advertisement recently comes to the forefront. Some feel that it will have an adversarial effect on the sports word. However, I agree with those who say that this give comfort sports word in obtaining new talent along with new techniques for preparation. In the following paragraphs, I will explore the rationale for both and beliefs as well as proffer my own rationale for a viewpoint on this matter.
Regarding those who feel that capitalizing in to sports advertisement does not help; there exists valid reason. The main justification is that players get engrossed toward money and practice less for the sports. The Alaska reported just last week that sports players of Alaska who got sponsor get less time for practice as they get involve in to some other kind of business.
Nevertheless, I cannot hold the opinion in good conscience. The fact is that individuals who got sponsor become motivated and practice well. The Harvard reported those Asian citizens, who got early sponsors they attained new skills and now they get hold of the game. That same Harvard report indicated that with the ingenuity of many companies’ teams proved that it helps them in their foster process; those who are always considered underdog are now the leading winners.
In sum, if everyone put a moratorium on a belief that investing money in sports game for advertisement purpose and pitches in like normal people others and I can bring change. I hope that soon everyone understands how this helps sports players and turn up the game.
- The bar chart shows the number of times per week (in 1000s), over five weeks, that three computer packages were downloaded from the internet.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Some people think that there are things individuals can do to help prevent global climate change. Others believe that action by individuals is useless and irrelevant and that it is only governments and large businesses which can make a difference. 78
- Some people think the air travel should be restricted because it causes environment pollution. Do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion and relevant examples. 32
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Your colleague from a different town is coming next month and you are moving out of your current accommodation. Write a letter to the colleague to recommend they move into your house and say– Why are you moving to another house?– Describe your present 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...onale for a viewpoint on this matter. Regarding those who feel that capitalizi...
^^^
Line 3, column 376, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...olve in to some other kind of business. Nevertheless, I cannot hold the opinion ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, nevertheless, regarding, so, well, kind of, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1330.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01886792453 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74557801696 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569811320755 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 403.2 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3331392004 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.307692308 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3846153846 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.15384615385 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292886300052 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0989942118247 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0604825412423 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171482999085 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0682557258283 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.