The shocking phenomenon of vested interest of money in to sports advertisement recently comes to the forefront. Some feel that it will have an antagonistic effect on the sports word. However, I agree with those who say that this give amenity to sports word for obtaining new talent along with new skills for preparation. In the following paragraphs, I will explore the rationale for both and beliefs as well as proffer my own viewpoint on this matter.
Regarding those who feel that capitalizing in to athletics endorsement does not help; there exists valid reason. The main justification is that players get engrossed toward money and practice less for the sports. The Alaska reported just last week that sports players of Alaska who got sponsor get less time for practice as they get involved in to some other types of business.
Nevertheless, I cannot hold the notion in good conscience. The fact is that individuals who got sponsor become motivated and practice well. The Harvard reported those Asian citizens, who got early sponsors they attained new skills and now they get hold of the game. That same Harvard report indicated that with the ingenuity of many companies’ teams proved that it helps them in their foster process; those who are always considered underdog are now the leading winners.
In sum, if everyone put a moratorium on a belief that investing money in sports game for advertisement purpose and pitches in like normal people others and I can bring change. I hope that soon everyone understands how this helps sports players and turn up the game.
- Many companies invest their money in sport games for advertisement purposes. Some people think it is good for the sport world, while others believe that it has some disadvantages. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
- The pie charts show the main reasons for migration to and from the UK in 2007.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- Children usually want to play the same games and watch the same TV programs as their friends. Should parents allow it or not? Give your opinion and examples from your own experience. 73
- Children usually want to play the same games and watch the same TV programs as their friends. Should parents allow it or not? Give your opinion and examples from your own experience. 73
- Children usually want to play the same games and watch the same TV programs as their friends. Should parents allow it or not? Give your opinion and examples from your own experience. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, nevertheless, regarding, so, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1322.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00757575758 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7020296422 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579545454545 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 402.3 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8669348853 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.692307692 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3076923077 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.46153846154 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263848234051 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0860070416956 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0652184242209 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155997566114 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0724050080134 0.056905535591 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.