Some people think that schools should reward students who show the best academic results, while other believe that it is more important to reward students who show improvements. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
People are undeniable that rewarding system has played a vital role in the education field. While there are good arguments that whether awards should be provided students who obtain the excellent academic results or those who show great improvements. I personally believe that the praising students who show remarkable enhancements is much more reasonable.
On the one hand, there are strong reasons why awards should be given to students having the highest marks. Firstly, it is understandable that the outstanding students deserve to receive a reward because of their continuous effort on studying process. For example, the excellent individuals are willing to spend the vast majority of time on studying instead of playing computer games or going out with friends. Secondly, by adopting this approach, this could create a competitive studying environment at school. As a consequence, school children put their effort into studying for achieving the best scores.
On the other hand, I consider that it is necessary to award students who make strides in their studies results. The first benefit is that prize can create motivation to make significant progress. This could give equal chances for students who are recognized for real efforts to receive awards. Another benefit is that the form of score assessment based on the knowledge of students also promote learning for enjoyment and understanding, not just gain high scores. Consequently, some negative phenomena which occur in the examination including pressure, anxiety, and cheating could be significantly reduced.
In conclusion, although rewarding students with the highest scores is remarkable, it seems to me that the consideration of student's improvement to grant a scholarship is the more favorable way to enhance student's motivation.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2017-06-21 | sonchip96hb | 89 | view |
- The graph shows estimated oil production capacity for several Gulf countries between 1990 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- Today more and more people are using mobile phones and computers. Thus, people are losing the ability to communicate face to face. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport why is it not popular in many places? How to increase its popularity 89
- The world s most urgent problem is caused by over population Do you agree or disagree 80
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1531.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52707581227 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97472924188 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617328519856 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.3972256651 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.357142857 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7857142857 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321417576738 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0996851348508 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0866204446396 0.0667982634062 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197323243409 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108663629251 0.056905535591 191% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.