tpo 41 integrated
In the lecture, the professor discussed why it is urgent to have stricter regulations for the disposition of coal ash.
To begin with, the reading claims that there have already been regulations concerning the handling of coal ash, such as using liner at disposal sites. However, the speaker refutes this by saying that current measurements are not efficient enough. Liner, for instance, is only required at newly-built landfills and older ones still pose severe threat to the environment.
Next, whilst the second argument in the passage asserts that stricter rules on the storing and handling of coal ash is likely to discourage consumers from buying products made by recycled coal ash, the lecturer uses mercury as a counter example. As an extremely toxic substance, the regulation for handling mercury is really rigorous, but products made from recycled mercury still had a good market in the past half century or so.
Finally, the instructor admits that harsher rules on the disposition of coal ash could raise the costs for power companies by about fifteen billion dollars, as stated in the reading material. But the professor points out that it will only lead to a minor increase in the price of electricity for each household. Thus, it is worthwhile to spend a little more money in exchange for a huge benefit on the environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-08-11 | mojtaba_aam | 90 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, really, second, so, still, thus, while, for instance, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 22.412803532 40% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1129.0 1373.03311258 82% => OK
No of words: 222.0 270.72406181 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08558558559 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6887817157 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.612612612613 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 346.5 419.366225166 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0177271533 49.2860985944 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.444444444 110.228320801 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 21.698381199 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4444444444 7.06452816374 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.460062522613 0.272083759551 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.164312697272 0.0996497079465 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116308497171 0.0662205650399 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.258552809658 0.162205337803 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0244783634198 0.0443174109184 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.42419426049 109% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.