lecture and the reading Passage discussing the 70 million years old fossil of Tyrannosaurus rex. According to the article, leg bone of the T-Rex fossil materials reveal like the blood vessel, red blood cell, and Collagen b matrix. However, the lecture refutes each research presents reading Passage and he doubts about the identification of Material by a researcher.
Firstly the article emphasizes that fossil of the leg bone contains channel structure and so flexible substance represents that blood vessel of T-Rex. In contrasts, the lecture mentions that substance are not blood vessel but something else. What organism died then, bacteria formed a colony. Moist residue and soft substance are trace of bacteria colony.therefore, article claims were not true.
Secondly, the reading passage implies that either one fossil present sphere which size and red color shown that its blood vessel of T-Rex. On contrary, the lecture explains that iron like structure was also found in the Prime fossil. This look like iron but it was a reddish mineral.
Lastly, the article claimed that collagen found by testing of the leg bone.The lecturer argues to this point and state that Collagen was not found even hundred thousand years old fossil, so it is improbable idea that collagen were found in 70 million old fossils because collagen is not a long last living tissue. The Roosters might come from the human skin, the researcher who handles the fossil bone.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 2, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Lecture
lecture and the reading Passage discussing the ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 76, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...llagen found by testing of the leg bone.The lecturer argues to this point and state...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, lastly, look, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1226.0 1373.03311258 89% => OK
No of words: 236.0 270.72406181 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19491525424 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53542836861 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 145.348785872 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572033898305 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 366.3 419.366225166 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.116997792494 855% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.0225129954 49.2860985944 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.166666667 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.06452816374 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.412495222083 0.272083759551 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145656154157 0.0996497079465 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11934288013 0.0662205650399 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.24326923451 0.162205337803 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0324819755447 0.0443174109184 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.3589403974 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.