sss
In the reading, the author claims that the cause of the abnormal little ice age, which was occurred from 1350 until 1900 C.E., is known through three viable reasons; however, the lecture refutes this idea by providing several counter example.
To begin with, writer strongly asserts that cold current which had gone into the Gulf stream due to the melted glaciers was the main cause for this phenomenon.Conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea that the cold current would have affected only Europe and North America, whereas, the ice age was observed on south hemisphere- including New land and South Africa as well. Thus altering in the gulf stream cannot be accounted for the severe climates changes associated with this region.
In addition, the writer claims that huge amount of dust, coming from enormous volcanic eruptions, obstructed the sunlight, thereby causing a little ice age in the era. On the other hand, the speaker belies this claims by clarifying the fact that scientifically, clouds of dust could have such ramifications on a large scale.Nevertheless, if the volcanic eruption has been the cause, it would have been accompanied by visual effects such as colorful sunset and gray or brown snow instead of white snow, according to this issue that no record was reported the volcanic activities were not strong enough to generate this cool environment.
Finally, the writer suggest that the decreasing e population and its subsequent environmental impact is to blame for cool climate. The lecturer, though, dismisses it by pointing out that in spite of the fact that the decrease in the numbers of people is true it by no means did not last long enough to be in impactful. Indeed, the population soon rebounded and they needed to cut the trees in order to clear the fields and prepare sufficient food for the growing population. Consequently, the forests could not render weather cold that much.
- TPO-24 - Integrated Writing Task Animal fossils usually provide very little opportunity to study the actual animal tissues, because in fossils the animals' living tissues have been largely replaced by minerals. Thus, scientists were very excited recently 78
- TPO-24 - Integrated Writing Task Animal fossils usually provide very little opportunity to study the actual animal tissues, because in fossils the animals' living tissues have been largely replaced by minerals. Thus, scientists were very excited recently 3
- north pole 73
- little ice age 80
- zebra mussel 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 159, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Conversely
... was the main cause for this phenomenon.Conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea that t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 324, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Nevertheless
...ave such ramifications on a large scale.Nevertheless, if the volcanic eruption has been the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, conversely, finally, however, if, nevertheless, so, thus, well, whereas, in addition, such as, in spite of, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1602.0 1373.03311258 117% => OK
No of words: 317.0 270.72406181 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05362776025 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80195091988 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 145.348785872 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611987381703 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 419.366225166 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 21.2450331126 165% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 123.031161364 49.2860985944 250% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 178.0 110.228320801 161% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.2222222222 21.698381199 162% => OK
Discourse Markers: 17.1111111111 7.06452816374 242% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.0 13.3589403974 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.41 53.8541721854 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.0289183223 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 63.6247240618 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 26.5 10.7273730684 247% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.498013245 152% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.2008830022 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.