The graph below shows the amount of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years.
The graph compares three companies in terms of waste which was discharged by them in 15 years.
It is clear that there is a downward trend in the waste output of company A while that of company C witnessed a considerable growth over the period given. On the contrary, the amount of waste produced by company B increased fast until 2005 and then it went down significantly.
In 2000, the figure for company A was the highest with 12 tons of waste. By contrast, the proportion of waste produced by company B and C was quite low, which were 9 tons and 5 tons of waste. Half a decade later, the volume of waste which was produced by company C was gradually climbing up. Also, the figure for company B grew considerably to about 10 tons. By contrast, that of company A began falling slowly to about 11 tons of waste. In 2015, the proportion for company B decreased tremendously, which was nearly 3 tons of waste while that of company C went up remarkably to about 10 tons. Meanwhile, company A saw a reduction in waste production, which was 9 tons of waste.
Overall, there is a general decrease in waste production of company A and B while company C experienced a rise over the period given.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-24 | Adeola Nafisat | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-16 | shell | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-01 | Evelyn_Han | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-04 | rohitbangari27@gmail.com | 67 | view |
| 2019-09-27 | Jerusha Roy Festus | 67 | view |
- Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language. Do you think this is a positive or negative social development? 78
- Some people think we need more female leaders to create world peace and reduce violence To what extent do you agree or disagree 76
- Many parents complain that computer games have no value to their children's study. On the contrary, those online games have produced a lot of negative effects on their mental and physical development. What is your opinion?Give reasons for your answer and 61
- The diagram illustrates the process that is used to manufacture bricks for the building industry.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 447, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...owly to about 11 tons of waste. In 2015, the proportion for company B decreased t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, then, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 981.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.5 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71725789113 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.449541284404 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.3189655071 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.1818181818 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8181818182 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.81818181818 5.23603664747 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 1.13902439024 790% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329763327971 0.215688989381 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145740040625 0.103423049105 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.087587422494 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.253177187038 0.15604864568 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0707411436426 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.82 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.04 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.