The use of mobile phone is as anti-social as smoking. Smoking is banned is certain places so the mobile phone should be banned like smoking. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
Some people argued that it is necessary for the government to impose a ban on mobile phones due to their harmful on society. In my opinion, I partly agree with this viewpoint on account of various reasons.
There is a common consensus that the authorities should not implement the interdiction of utilization of cell phone by dint of its benefits bringing. The first outstanding reason is, the mobile phone provides individuals the ability to keep contact with their friends as well as their family. As a result, they can call immediately to their relatives for the help in urgent circumstance related to important business even to their life, which can not be realized if governments leaders ban the use of mobile phone. The next justification can be mentioned is, since the smartphone nowadays has been equipped GPS technology, parents can keep track their children with a view to protecting them from heinous law-offenders. For instance, it is the supervision of parents through tracking monitor of mobile phone that helps children to avoid social criminals, ranging from kidnapper to pedophile.
On the other hand, I believe that government leaders should promulgate an interdiction to the use of mobile phone in some specific places and times. Firstly, the cellphone should be forbidden during courses at school. No sooner are students not allowed to turn their phone on in class than they can have more concentration in lessons, which pay the road for them on acquiring a higher academic performance. Secondly, it is reasonable to prohibit the cellphone in museums requiring to pay a pricey entrance ticket. Therefore, the visitors can not take the pictures of those oeuvres through their smartphone, which may contribute to the protection of intellectual property of artists. Besides, visitors will have more time of contemplating the art pieces instead of diverting their time on taking photos.
In conclusion, although the mobile phone has been proved to be beneficial for the community, I am of opinion that government should enact some measures to manage the use of cellphones in some particular areas.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-07-06 | Tommy_aquarius | 84 | view |
- Scientist and Tourist travel to remote natural environments, such as South Pole. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 36
- The use of mobile phone is as anti-social as smoking. Smoking is banned is certain places so the mobile phone should be banned like smoking. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 84
- Some people think that families have the most powerful influence on children s development Other believe that other things have greater effects Discuss both view and give your own opinion 77
- Some working parents believe childcare centers can provide the best care for their children Others believe that family members like grandparents can do a better job Discuss both view and give your opinion 89
- Some people believe that school children should not be given homework by their teachers, whereas others argue that homework plays an important role in the education of children. Discuss both of these views and give your own opinion. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 254, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'turning'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: turning
...ool. No sooner are students not allowed to turn their phone on in class than they can h...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 482, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'paying'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: paying
...ibit the cellphone in museums requiring to pay a pricey entrance ticket. Therefore, th...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1782.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19533527697 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92810374346 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568513119534 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 553.5 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4441235733 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.285714286 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7142857143 7.06120827912 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217733848219 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0774314369564 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0638417130782 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14228236233 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0252172078264 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.