The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The maps illustrate plans for Islip Town centre at this moment and an arrangement for the advance. It is clear that there are many places will be removed and will be built to a new building as replace shops to the shopping centre.
First, in the north part of the Islip Town has located countryside and are many shops along the side of the main road. On the other hand, in the south is more for school and housing, but still, have shops along the main road. Equally, in the east-south is located by a huge park. In the same way, the main road is placing in the middle of the Islip town.
Furthermore, there will be building up a new facility in the north part of the town, such as bus station, shopping malls, car parks and new housing. It is obvious that the main road will be solely replacing for pedestrians. Moreover, a school will locate at the same place and the park will smaller than it used to be. Further, there are going to build a Dual carriageway around the city centre.
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The graphs below give information about computer ownership as a percentage of the population between 2002 and 2010 and by level of education for the years 2002 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecti 74
- Many governments think that economic progress in their most important goal. Some people, however, think that other types of progress are equally important for a country.Discuss both these views and give you own opinion. 56
- The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods. 86
- WRITING TASK 2A person's worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such a honour, kindness and trust, no longer seem important.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 65
- These days many of us prefer to throw damaged things away, whereas in the past people used to repair damaged items and keep them for a long time. Explain why you think this change has happened. What are the effects of this change in attitude? 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, moreover, so, still, such as, in the same way, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 805.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.35135135135 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.24864864865 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535135135135 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.7913655656 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.5 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.9 5.23603664747 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126770730505 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.061964110771 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0719928900175 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.098811591509 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0432554261303 0.0819641961636 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.3 13.2329268293 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.95 11.4140731707 70% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.75 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.