There are social, medical and technical problems associated with the use of mobile phones. What form do these problems take? Do you think they outweigh its benefits?
It is about the relationship between mobile phones and social, medical and technical troubles. While cell phones can give rise to these problems, I hold a conviction that some benefits can outweigh these drawbacks.
On the one hand, there are several potential problems associated with the use of telephones. As to medical field, telephones emit radio-frequency radiation, which is considered to cause hidden damage to humanity’s health, such as tumor growth and short-sightedness. Moreover, some social problems can stem from the use of this technological gadget. This is because people have a tendency to indulge in a virtual world and to be isolated from the real world. Take the kids, whose parents give them mobile phones with some animated applications as a convincing example. These intriguing devices can make their eye glued to and gradually become solitary children. Finally, the overuse of telephones makes people be technologically inclined, posing untold threats to people’s academic writing performance, because of their exploitation of unconstrained languages, such as slangs or jargons.
On the other hand, I would argue that despite these downsides, they cannot be outweighed by considerable benefits reaped by the appreciate use of telephones. Firstly, telephones can facilitate communication between people. Considered as brilliant technological inventions, cell phones can supersede the traditional ways of interacting. For example, business people in different countries have a tendency to make a teleconference to save travel cost. In addition, cell phones also beneficial effects on medical field. The doctor can diagnose the patients’ conditions and give them a prescription in case the distance deters these invalids going to the medical center in person.
In conclusion, although telephones cause some problems to users, it seems to be that the benefits of these technical gadgets still overwhelm the drawbacks.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-07-11 | lauranguyen | 84 | view |
- Nowadays people always throw the old thing away when they buy new things and we are living in a throwaway society What factors cause this phenomenon What problem does leads to 92
- There are social, medical and technical problems associated with the use of mobile phones. What form do these problems take? Do you think they outweigh its benefits? 84
- Some people think zoos are cruel and all the zoos should be closed. However, others think zoos are useful to protect the rare animals. Discuss both these views and give your opinion. 89
- Some people think the cheap air flight gives ordinary people more freedom However others think the cheap air flights should be banned because it pollutes the air and bring many other problems Discuss both views and give your opinion 91
- Many people believe that teachers should take the responsibility for the students to judge what is right and wrong and behave well, while others feel that teacher should only take academic subjects. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 125, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ghed by considerable benefits reaped by the appreciate use of telephones. Firstly, telephones ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, still, while, as to, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1666.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.70547945205 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28953286334 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585616438356 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.290984916 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.125 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.25 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5625 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204776515293 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0685419990222 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.066026636285 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135048826714 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0266580500931 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.