Detailed descriptions of crimes are often given in the newspaper or on TV. Some people think it has bad consequences on the society and so should be restricted. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In recent decades, detailed descriptions of criminals on mainstream media and newspapers have been attracting a great deal of public attention due to the substantial impacts on citizens’ mental health. Given that they could be fraught with negative consequences, a higher degree of restriction of these contents should be encouraged.
It is true that there are many disadvantages related to the detailed descriptions of crimes. First, Young people have a penchant for mimicking the activities from the criminal description due to their immaturity of cognitive ability, thereby increasing the rates of juvenile delinquency. In addition, A constant exposure to these violent materials from these crime descriptions could culminate in some mental impairments in children. This means that young people would be in the belief that the society is full of people with evil intents, which acts as the deterrent for their desire for interacting with other people, making them more sensitive to autism.
Additionally, official authorities should take action to restrict the mainstreaming of crime descriptions on televisions and newspapers. It is effective that the legislation of heavy monetary punishment on any practice of displaying detailed descriptions of criminal of public media should be enacted. This would make the producers of these criminal materials think twice as they would take the heavy fine into consideration. In fact, a high degree of censorship of criminal descriptions on Vietnamese programs is instrumental in the fall in crime commissions, especially in juvenile delinquency rates.
In conclusion, Detailed descriptions of crimes on televisions and newspapers should be strictly censored or even prohibited for some negative impacts.Governments worldwide should impose a heavy fine on any intents of producing these violent materials to discourage individuals from committing crimes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-30 | thule98.joanne | 78 | view |
- The graph shows Underground Station Passenger Numbers in London 89
- The chart below shows the number of travellers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000. 78
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The graph shows estimated oil production capacity for several Gulf countries between 1990 and 2010 61
- Some people think that it is important to have a single language as an international official language Others think that it will make it difficult to identify countries and cause a loss of culture Discuss both views and give your opinion 93
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 152, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Governments
...en prohibited for some negative impacts.Governments worldwide should impose a heavy fine on...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, so, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1633.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.79078014184 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33693219033 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.54609929078 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.9476084049 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.454545455 106.682146367 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6363636364 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27272727273 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223038634784 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0859933552285 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0367148651995 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14151407772 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.014763388964 0.056905535591 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 13.0946893788 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.6 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.97 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.