: In the future, it seems more difficult to live on the Earth. Some people think more money should be spent on researching other planet to live, such as Mars. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Space exploration is an interesting topic that many people care about. Some claims that it seems harder for humans’s life on the Earth, so space research should be poured more money. Personally, I disagree with this opinion.
It is true that the survival of people on the Earth has been threatened. There is a substantial increase in the volume of the polluted environment because of humans’s activities such as burning forest or exploitingnatural resources. These activities have bad affecton nature and lead to many pollution problems. Thus, the health of people have to suffer many diseases that are caused by the contaminated environment. Besides, by comparison with the past, more and more unpredictable catastrophes have happened. This makes people have to endure natural disasters without preparation and it can directly threaten humans’s life.
However, spending more money on space research is not a good solution to protect humans’s life. In fact, space researches have many risks and are difficult to become successful. A research about the cosmos needs a long time to prepare and a huge amount of money to implement. It have to face some potential hazard such as loss of signal or rocket could be hit by meteorites. Therefore, money that are investigated in space exploration may be wasted. In addition, pouring money into protecting our environment may be a better solution. People can do some activities to protect the environment such as devoloping a machine that has ability to clean water or air, and government should impose an official ban on exploitation. These activities can bring a great result in a short term and have positive influence on the health of people.
In conclusion, I firmly hold the view that it is unnecessary to spend more money on researching other plan to live.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-13 | hana99 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-21 | vantran2297 | 89 | view |
| 2019-10-15 | Vu Thi Hoang Ngan | 84 | view |
| 2018-11-26 | dungha23 | 73 | view |
| 2018-02-21 | sho2501 | 89 | view |
- Some people think that shops should not be allowed to sell food or drinks that are scientifically proven to be bad for people's health.Do you agree or disagree? 73
- Scientists believe that by studying behavior of 3 years old children, we can predict if that child can become criminal in the future. To what extent is crime a product of human nature? Is it possible to stop children from growing to be a criminal? 56
- the chart below shows the amount of energy consumed in 3 countries in the year 2000 and the rate of increase in energy consumption as compared with the year 1999 79
- Traffic and accommodation problems are increasing and government should encourage some businesses to move from cities to rural areas Does advantage outweigh the disadvantages 71
- write a description of how a refrigerator works 47
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 183, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: Research
...and are difficult to become successful. A research about the cosmos needs a long time to p...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 284, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'has'?
Suggestion: has
...a huge amount of money to implement. It have to face some potential hazard such as l...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1535.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18581081081 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09214282376 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560810810811 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.0206164556 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.2777777778 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4444444444 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276948671179 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0836945138561 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0661858651308 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188092518587 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0523930939294 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.