The topic is about the serious problems and limitations in the British archaeology field. The lecture refutes the three ideas mentioned in the reading passage by arguing that the new rules and guideline in 1990s would improve these situations.
To begin with, the lecturer suggests that the new guidelines require an examination of the construction site by the archaeology experts before the construction starts to see if the site is an archaeology interest. If it is a valuable site, the relevant people will gather together and make a preservation plan. The reading passage, however, argues that the construction projects would destroy the valuable sites without preserving the artifacts uncovered during the construction process.
In the second place, the lecturer indicates that according to the new guideline, the construction company would support the archaeological research. The company would pay for the examination before the construction and all the archaeology works done at the construction site, which is a whole new financial support. The funding of the construction company would allow the researchers to study a far greater range of archaeology sites than they could in the past. The reading passage gives the opposite view. It says that supports from government funds and grants are inadequate. Many interesting projects were remain unsupported.
Lastly, according to the lecturer, the new guidelines provided a lot more paid jobs for archaeologists than before. Archaeology experts are hired at all stages of the project. Increased jobs and careers have increased the number of archaeologists in Britain, which is the highest it has ever been. This is in direct contradiction with the claim in the reading passage that only a few archaeology positions are available. Many people end up with other jobs and contribute to the research with no paid.
- TPO-48 - Integrated Writing Task In recent years, many frog species around the world have declined in numbers or even gone extinct due to changes in their environment. These population declines and extinctions have serious consequences for the ecosystems 79
- Do you agree or disagree: to be successful in business, companies must put more money in advertising. 41
- TPO-08 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television advertising directed towards young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO-10 - Integrated Writing Task The sea otter is a small mammal that lives in waters along the western coast of North America from California to Alaska. When some sea otter populations off the Alaskan coast started rapidly declining a few years ago, it c 72
- TPO-06 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Life today is easier and more comfortable than it was when your grandparents were children.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 81
Essay evaluation report
Many interesting projects were remain unsupported.
Many interesting projects were remaining unsupported.
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 26 in 30
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 16 12
No. of Words: 293 250
No. of Characters: 1544 1200
No. of Different Words: 153 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.137 4.2
Average Word Length: 5.27 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.995 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 111 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 95 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 63 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 46 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 18.312 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.414 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.312 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.325 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.513 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.057 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 204, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1990s'.
Suggestion: in the 1990s
...rguing that the new rules and guideline in 1990s would improve these situations. To ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 489, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...overed during the construction process. In the second place, the lecturer indica...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 464, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...logy sites than they could in the past. The reading passage gives the opposite view...
^^^
Line 5, column 611, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'remained'.
Suggestion: remained
...dequate. Many interesting projects were remain unsupported. Lastly, according to t...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, lastly, second, to begin with, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 22.412803532 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.01324503311 259% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1584.0 1373.03311258 115% => OK
No of words: 293.0 270.72406181 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40614334471 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04425381256 2.5805825403 118% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529010238908 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 419.366225166 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.6064186192 49.2860985944 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3125 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 7.06452816374 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348655525463 0.272083759551 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111938575129 0.0996497079465 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0543049214059 0.0662205650399 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19426243174 0.162205337803 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0755751275586 0.0443174109184 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.3589403974 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.2367328918 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.