Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Sometimes people think nowadays the media (TV, newspaper, Internet) are less concerned about the accuracy of news than in the past, and the incorrect information may cause problem to the public.
In recent decades, with the developing technology especially communication technology and devices such as Internet and computers and mobile systems, the Internet is easily available in any part of the world, even in the regions which placed far away from the cities. Some people believe that the society may face with the problem when it receive less accurate news. I disagree with the statement and strongly believe that the society will not only face with the problem but also they will get accurate news rather than the past they did.
First, with the availability of Internet and communication devices around the whole part of the world, more people are able to use it. Also, more people are willing to work in media and this will create a competition among the news agency which finally make them more accurate in publication of the news. This is because they are following to get more subscription and if they do not public accurate news, they can’t remain in competition with their counterparts. For example, there was a recently-conducted news agency in our country which could get more subscription in our country until now. At the first, I was very interested in following the news from their websites. But after that I recognize that the mentioned news agency are depended to an organization out of our country, and public deliberately inaccurate news in order to some specific goal, I do not check their news anymore.
Second, inaccurate or deliberately one-sided news from some specific websites or channels which public some news in order to some specific aims will not only affect the public mentality but also the negative reflex of their one-sided news will decrease their less popularity further. For example, you can see in some countries that the authority-independent media’s play an important role in victory of a specific candidate, while, the authority-dependent medias are not available to play such important roles.
As a result, being in a competition for news agency in order to get more subscription make them to public accurate news. Also, awareness of a society will not allow the public to face with problem.
- tpo12- Do you agree or disagree with following statement? It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects to specialize in one specific subject. 37
- Question: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to use printed material such as books and articles to do research than it is to use the internet. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- tpo11- Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Othersthink access to much information creates problems. 81
- do you agree with the following statement? Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people? use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- tpo29 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 339, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'receives'?
Suggestion: receives
...ciety may face with the problem when it receive less accurate news. I disagree with the...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, may, second, so, while, for example, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1801.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 355.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07323943662 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96984246936 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 212.727598566 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.447887323944 0.524837075471 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 588.6 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.2334905093 48.9658058833 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.538461538 100.406767564 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3076923077 20.6045352989 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76923076923 5.45110844103 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221372382588 0.236089414692 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0924507427731 0.076458572812 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447234186667 0.0737576698707 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143908365463 0.150856017488 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0418988872813 0.0645574589148 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 11.7677419355 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 58.1214874552 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.1575268817 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 86.8835125448 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.