The article states that the fossil information of Agnostids which were a group of marine animals did not give the paleontologists enough information to help them to determine what did Agnostids eat of how they behave and provides three theories about how these creatures may have lived. However, the professoe explains that each of these theories has weveral weaknesses and refutes each of the theories.
First, the reading claims that Agnostids were free-swimming predators. The professor opposes this point by saying that predators need large well-developed eyes. According to the professor, the predators need good vision to help them to follow a pray. He puts forth that these marines had a small eyes or they may have been comepletely blind. In order to be able to follow their pray they need to have some sensing organism to help them but the fossil records did not shoe anything.
Second, the author declares that Agnostids may have dwelled on the seafloor. Nevertheless, the professor contends that seafloor creatures did not have the ability to move fast or far and they move very slow on the ocean floor. He states that seefloor marines stay localized and occupy in small geographical areas. But the fossil records show that Agnostids found in multiple areas and they were spread in large areas of the ocean so these creatures could move fast which is unusual for seafloor creatures.
Third, the article avers that Agnostids were parasites. The professor refutes this point by stating that the population of the parasites are not large. He put forth that parasites stay in small areas and the number of them is limited. Based on the lecture, if the population of these animals increases they would kill off the host organism where they live. Nonetheless, there are vast amount of Agnostids fossils that is found. Thus, it is not possible for this creatures to be parasites.
- A company has announced that it wishes to build a large factory near your community. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this new influence on your community. Do you support or oppose the factory? Explain your position. 70
- If you could make one important change in a school that you attended, what change would you make? Use reasons and specific examples to support your answer. 76
- TPO-40 - Integrated Writing Task Many scientists believe it would be possible to maintain a permanent human presence on Mars or the Moon. On the other hand, conditions on Venus are so extreme and inhospitable that maintaining a human presence there would 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives.Use specific reasons and examples to 70
- TPO-41 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 386, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'amounts'?
Suggestion: amounts
... they live. Nonetheless, there are vast amount of Agnostids fossils that is found. Thu...
^^^^^^
Line 8, column 458, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... is found. Thus, it is not possible for this creatures to be parasites.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, nonetheless, second, so, third, thus, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 22.412803532 165% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1581.0 1373.03311258 115% => OK
No of words: 314.0 270.72406181 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03503184713 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6038747081 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 145.348785872 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 479.7 419.366225166 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 55.7314370852 49.2860985944 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4705882353 21.698381199 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05882352941 7.06452816374 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.404506227973 0.272083759551 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129175517565 0.0996497079465 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103797288143 0.0662205650399 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.251127281093 0.162205337803 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0221207053171 0.0443174109184 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.3589403974 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.