Agree or disagree: people should not spend a lot of time on communicating by technologies, such as through social media or with text message.
Communicating by technologies has become a double-edged sword: on the one hand, it allows people to communicate quickly with anyone around the world; on the other hand, people spends too much time on the technology product rather than on the real world. In my opinion, I disagree that people should spend less time on communicating by technologies.
First of all, advanced social media can save a lot of time which is precise for people nowadays. It is more time-consuming to meet a person face to face because you need to arrange time and match other’s schedule. With the communicating software, one can easily connect to the other and discuss important issue right away. Furthermore, there is no need to worry about other’s time are not suitable for you because you can always leave your message and just wait for the response. For instance, my father is a manager of an international company so he always needs to have a meeting with other business men. With the social media, they can quickly express their opinion on the social group and discuss in the text message which takes them a little time but can have a conclusion soon.
Another important factor for using communicating software is that it makes no distance for people who are apart from two places. People spend time on communicating by technologies can actually enforce the connection between others. Even though people are not in the same area or time zone, they can still speak to others and text their words to express their care through these technologies. For example, my boyfriend and I are long distance love so we can only use social media to update the daily life of each other. I do spend a lot of my time on communicating by text message or skype but I feel that we are even more close to each other.
In conclusion, although some may argue that people are addicted to the social media and cannot communicate in the real world, I would say that people spend their time on communicating technologies may actually save their precise time and improve the connection with others.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-30 | powerpratik | 68 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Others believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are related to 87
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The ability to maintain a small number of friends for a long time is more important to happiness than the ability to make new friends easily. 60
- When people succeed it is because of hard work Luck has nothing to do with success Do you agree or disagree with the quotation above Use specific reasons and examples to explain your position 74
- Some parent offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school Do you think this is a good idea?Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 434, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'distanced'.
Suggestion: distanced
...or example, my boyfriend and I are long distance love so we can only use social media to...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, furthermore, if, may, so, still, apart from, for example, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, first of all, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1718.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 356.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82584269663 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75587996555 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491573033708 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 551.7 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.2740316569 48.9658058833 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.714285714 100.406767564 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4285714286 20.6045352989 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6428571429 5.45110844103 214% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.349988180601 0.236089414692 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138618435365 0.076458572812 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0847437195496 0.0737576698707 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238196394721 0.150856017488 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0345412347576 0.0645574589148 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 86.8835125448 63% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.