ETS traditional voting system
The lecture explained why the computerized voting system can not replace the traditional voting system.There are following three reasons.
First of all, not everyone can use computers correctly. Some people do not have the computers, some people are not use of computer, and some people are scared of this new technology. If the voters do not know how to use a computer, how do you expect them to finish the voting process through computers. This directly refutes the reading passage which states that computerized voting is easier by just touching the screen.
Secondly, computers may make mistakes as the people do. As computers are programmed by the human beings, thus errors are inevitable in computer system. Problems caused by computer voting systems may be more serious than those caused by people. A larger number of votes might be miscounted or even removed from the system. Furthermore, it would take more energy to recount the votes. Again this contradicts what is stated in reading which stated that only people will make mistakesin counting.
Thirdly, computerized voting system is not reliable because it has not reached a stable status. People trust computers to conduct banking transactions because the computerized banking system is being used daily and frequently and has been stable. However, the voting does not happen as often as banking thus the computerized voting system has not been proved to be totally reliable. All in all, not everyone can use a computer properly, computer cause mistakes and computerized voting system is not reliable are the main reasons why computerized voting system can not replace the traditional voting system.
- Is it more important to be able to work with a group of people on a team or to work independently Use reasons and specific examples to support your answer 55
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Children should be required to help with household tasks as soon as they are able.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 80
- Zoo 80
- ETS traditional voting system 78
- TPO 48 Integrated Writing 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 104, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: There
...t replace the traditional voting system.There are following three reasons. First o...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, thus, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 12.0772626932 33% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 22.412803532 45% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 30.3222958057 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1405.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 267.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26217228464 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71588526415 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513108614232 0.540411800872 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 443.7 419.366225166 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.0898509804 49.2860985944 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.6666666667 110.228320801 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.26666666667 7.06452816374 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330506798797 0.272083759551 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124242741085 0.0996497079465 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.131938550994 0.0662205650399 199% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.247197749259 0.162205337803 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.146108410316 0.0443174109184 330% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.8541721854 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.