The charts given compares the popularity of eight recreational activities in the US between 1999 and 2009.
Overall, in both two years, the proportion of walking makes up most of the charts. In addition, there were significant changes in the figures of yoga, jogging and aerobics over the period.
From 1999 to 2009, the figures of soccer and camping slightly increased by 1%, from 17% and 8% to 18% and 9%. Meanwhile, yoga and swimming, which constitute only 5% and 9% in 1999, became increasingly more popular with doubles in the number of people who participated in these activities.
As it can be seen, during the ten-year period, walking, which constitutes 29% and 31%, was the most common activity among Americans. By contrast, the rates of jogging (7%), aerobics (13%) and bicycling (12%) which were considered to be relatively low in 1999, experienced dramatic falls by nearly half respectively during ten years
- Public libraries should provide books and not waste their limited resources on expensive high tech media such as software videos or DVDs 81
- The diagrams below show the site of a school in 2004 and the plan for changes to the school site in 2024. 73
- The money given to help poor countries does not solve the problem of poverty, so rich countries should give other types of help instead. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- Some people think that Genetically modified (GM) crops are a positive development. Others, however, argue that they are potentially dangerous. Discuss both these views and give your opinion. 61
- In many countries the proportion of older people is steadily increasing Does this trend have positive or negative effects on society 91
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 771.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 152.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07236842105 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51124308557 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79684199384 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.684210526316 0.547539520022 125% => OK
syllable_count: 220.5 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9715253143 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.142857143 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7142857143 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.71428571429 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127432062302 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0603441140445 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0528016623058 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0849534283946 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0551473356792 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.